2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0218126620501042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Joint DOA and Polarization Estimation for Polarization-Sensitive Coprime Arrays Via Reduced-Dimensional Root Finding Approach

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the problem of blind joint multi-parameter estimation for polarization-sensitive coprime linear arrays (PS-CLAs). We propose a reduced-dimensional polynomial root finding approach, which first utilizes the relation between the two subarrays to reconstruct the spectrum function and then converts three-dimensional (3D) total spectral search (TSS) to one-dimensional (1D) TSS. Furthermore, 1D polynomial root finding technique is employed to obtain the ambiguous direction of arrival (D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where R S can be estimated by considering the eigendecomposition of the covariance matrix R X in (14) as…”
Section: Pair-matching Of Azimuth and Elevationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where R S can be estimated by considering the eigendecomposition of the covariance matrix R X in (14) as…”
Section: Pair-matching Of Azimuth and Elevationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U Xs and U Xn denote the signal and noise subspace eigenvector matrices, respectively, Λ s ∈ C K×K and Λ n ∈ C (2W −1−K)×(2W −1−K) denote the diagonal matrices composed of the eigenvalues of R X with respect to U Xs and U Xn respectively. Using (14) and 29, R S can be estimated by [36]R…”
Section: Pair-matching Of Azimuth and Elevationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ULAs also have distinct disadvantages, such as smaller array aperture, less degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) and higher mutual coupling ratio compared with sparse linear arrays. As we know, more DOFs indicates that more source signals can be recognized, larger array aperture means higher resolution, lower mutual coupling ratio demonstrates less adverse effect on DOA estimation performance [15][16][17][18]. A large number of array structures have been proposed to address these shortcomings of ULAs in recent decades, such as minimum redundancy array (MRA) [19], original coprime array (OCA) [20], augmented coprime array (ACA) [21] and nested array (NA) [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ULAs also have distinct disadvantages, such as smaller array aperture, less degrees‐of‐freedom (DOFs) and higher mutual coupling ratio compared with sparse linear arrays. As we know, more DOFs indicates that more source signals can be recognized, larger array aperture means higher resolution, lower mutual coupling ratio demonstrates less adverse effect on DOA estimation performance [15–18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direction of arrival (DOA) estimation, also known as angle estimation, is a significant research subject in array signal processing [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and has been successfully utilised in the fields such as speech, radar, astronomy, sonar, wireless communication etc. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Traditionally, because of the limitation of the Nyquist sampling theorem, theuniform linear array (ULA) is widely applied to DOA estimation, and a lot of DOA estimation algorithms have been proposed for ULA, such as multiple signal classification (MUSIC) [23] and estimation of the signal parameter via rotational invariance techniques (ESPRIT) [24] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%