1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1996.550190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind separation of convolutive mixtures using second and fourth order moments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this result is consistent with some results in [12,13]. Suppose that H(z) is full rank for all z.…”
Section: Sketch Of Proofsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that this result is consistent with some results in [12,13]. Suppose that H(z) is full rank for all z.…”
Section: Sketch Of Proofsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is emphasized in [12,13] where whitening is done by linear prediction. In contrast to [12,13], our approach is more robust in the sense that we do not need exact knowledge of the order of channels.…”
Section: Sketch Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical assumption in this area is that the number of sources is less than the number of observations. Icart and Gautier (1996) present a method in which the generative model of Eq. (5) is modelled using an auto-regressive moving average (ARMA) model.…”
Section: B Anechoic Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods have been used in the published literature to indicate separation performance. The list includes mean-square-error (MSE) [20], [21] bit per symbol error rate [22], [23], Frobenius distance [24], multichannel row and multichannel column intersymbol interference (ISI) [25], plot of global mixing filter responses [26]- [28], signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [29]- [31], interference-to-signal ratio (ISR) [19], signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) [32]- [38], one-at-a-time SIR [8], ISI [39]- [41], bias and standard deviation of filter coefficients [42], [43], plot of estimated sources in the time or frequency domain [44]- [46], hand-segmented SIR [47], automatic speech recognition rate [48], [33], [34], and the mean opinion score [18]. Several of these are not ideal for comparisons because they are either subjective, such as the plots and the mean opinion score, or require knowledge of the mixing filters, which makes them inapplicable for real mixtures.…”
Section: Figures Of Merit For Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%