2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2890304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Stereoscopic Image Quality Assessment Based on Hierarchical Learning

Abstract: We proposed a blind image quality assessment model which used classification and prediction for three-dimensional (3D) image quality assessment (denoted as CAP-3DIQA) that can automatically evaluate the quality of stereoscopic images. First, in the classification stage, the model separated the distorted images into several subsets according to the types of image distortions. This process will assign the images with the same distortion type to the same group. After the classification stage, the classified disto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the proposed model with three 2D IQA models (SSIM, BRISQUE [62] and ADD-GSIM [72]) and eleven 3D metrics: Shao2016 [16], Shao2017 [73], Zhou2017 [10], Zhou'2017 [12], Liu2018 [74], Wang2018 [75], Ma2018 [20], Yue2018 [40] Shao2018 [17], Chen2019 [21], and Liu2019 [18], on LIVE 3D Phase I and LIVE 3D Phase II. Works conducted on MCL 3D Database are relatively fewer, so here we take eight works compared with our proposed model on MCL 3D Database: SSIM, BRISQUE, Shao2016, Zhou2017, Liu2018 [74], Yang'2018 [15], Chen2019 and Liu2019.…”
Section: B Overall Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare the proposed model with three 2D IQA models (SSIM, BRISQUE [62] and ADD-GSIM [72]) and eleven 3D metrics: Shao2016 [16], Shao2017 [73], Zhou2017 [10], Zhou'2017 [12], Liu2018 [74], Wang2018 [75], Ma2018 [20], Yue2018 [40] Shao2018 [17], Chen2019 [21], and Liu2019 [18], on LIVE 3D Phase I and LIVE 3D Phase II. Works conducted on MCL 3D Database are relatively fewer, so here we take eight works compared with our proposed model on MCL 3D Database: SSIM, BRISQUE, Shao2016, Zhou2017, Liu2018 [74], Yang'2018 [15], Chen2019 and Liu2019.…”
Section: B Overall Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle the asymmetric distortion, Shao et al [17] designed an NR metric by utilizing both monocular and binocular properties for quality assessment. Likewise, Liu et al [18] combined the monocular and binocular information and proposed a blind SIQA model by using the SVM method to fuse the quality score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of stereo image applications, many related stereo image technologies and services have been introduced in our daily lives as well as in many professional fields [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. A variety of distortions can occur during the collection, transmission, processing, and displaying of stereo images [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. erefore, it is of immense practical significance to establish a high-performance stereo image quality evaluation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, objective evaluation plays a dominant role in SIQE. ere are three main types of objective stereo image quality evaluation methods: full-reference (FR) evaluation [4][5][6][7][8], reduced-reference (RR) evaluation [9], and no-reference (NR) evaluation [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. e FR evaluation method compares the undistorted original image with the distorted image to obtain the difference between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation