2020
DOI: 10.1177/1476127020976203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind to the future: Exploring the contingent effect of managerial hubris on strategic foresight

Abstract: Extending research on the role of managerial cognition in strategic decision-making, in this study, we examine the relationship between managerial hubris and strategic foresight. Building on the information-processing model, we argue that managerial hubris leads to a reduced level of strategic foresight due to biases in attending to information as well as encoding and processing information. We further argue that R&D capability moderates the impact in ways depending on the levels of R&D human and physi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 A kind of escalation exists when moving from confidence to hubris. While confidence is grounded in a rational process of categorization and evaluation of information (Gist & Mitchell, 1992;Bandura, 1997), hubristic CEOs manage information in trusting and unwise fashion (Li & Sullivan, 2020), thereby conferring high importance to chances of success due to their contribution. The boundary line between confidence and hubris regards how people process information.…”
Section: Ceos' Hubrismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 A kind of escalation exists when moving from confidence to hubris. While confidence is grounded in a rational process of categorization and evaluation of information (Gist & Mitchell, 1992;Bandura, 1997), hubristic CEOs manage information in trusting and unwise fashion (Li & Sullivan, 2020), thereby conferring high importance to chances of success due to their contribution. The boundary line between confidence and hubris regards how people process information.…”
Section: Ceos' Hubrismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of prospective is perceived, from the sense of previewing to delineate trajectories of action and strategically manage organizational processes [48] as the case of professional practices in interorganizational and intersectoral cooperation contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they may not pay close attention to the current climate because they consider their organizations competent, resourceful, and powerful (Tang et al 2015). As a result, hubristic managers tend to identify and encode information cues for future trends of the present, uncertain and dynamic environment in which information quickly becomes obsolete (Li and Sullivan 2022).…”
Section: Failure Myopiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, although hubristic managers can predict future environmental conditions, they can overestimate or underestimate the validity of predictions over existing conditions, reducing the effectiveness of information absorption for future strategic views. That is, they may fail to process such information in a thoughtful and future-oriented manner, and their estimates of the relationship between current information cues and future scenarios of events can be very biased (Li and Sullivan 2022). Hubristic managers tend to be independent and less cautious.…”
Section: Failure Myopiamentioning
confidence: 99%