2019
DOI: 10.1101/834572
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blinking Statistics and Molecular Counting in direct Stochastic Reconstruction Microscopy (dSTORM)

Abstract: Many recent advancements in single molecule localization microscopy exploit the stochastic photo-switching of fluorophores to reveal complex cellular structures beyond the classical diffraction limit. However, this same stochasticity makes counting the number of molecules to high precision extremely challenging. Modeling the photoswitching behavior of a fluorophore as a continuous time Markov process transitioning between a single fluorescent and multiple dark states, and fully mitigating for missed blinks and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the numbers of molecules counted was mostly <10 per cluster, it is important to note that these figures should be considered as rough estimates and not true numbers of molecules. The accurate determination of molecule numbers using SMLM methods remains a challenge due to labelling efficiency, re-emitting fluorophores, variable imaging conditions and differences in analytical approaches [ 66 ]. A potential undercounting in our experiments may arise from low labelling efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the numbers of molecules counted was mostly <10 per cluster, it is important to note that these figures should be considered as rough estimates and not true numbers of molecules. The accurate determination of molecule numbers using SMLM methods remains a challenge due to labelling efficiency, re-emitting fluorophores, variable imaging conditions and differences in analytical approaches [ 66 ]. A potential undercounting in our experiments may arise from low labelling efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the numbers of molecules counted was mostly <10 per cluster, it is important to note that these figures should be considered as rough estimates and not true numbers of molecules. The accurate determination of molecule numbers using SMLM methods remains a challenge due to labelling efficiency, re-emitting fluorophores, variable imaging conditions and differences in analytical approaches (60). A potential undercounting in our experiments may arise from low labelling efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The on state was accessible from any of the dark states, while dark state 0 was accessible only from the on state, and dark states 01 and 02 were accessible only from the previous dark states, 0 and 01, respectively. We used the following parameters (using the notation described in (16, 18)) to capture essential elements of our experimental observations: λ (0 → 1) = 1.2 Hz; λ (0 → 01) =0.05 Hz; λ (01 → 02) =0.0033 Hz; λ (01 → 1) =0.02 Hz; λ (02 → 1) =0.0005 Hz; 2(1 → 0) = 5 Hz; μ(1 → B ) =0.05 Hz. The continuous time Markov process was simulated with the MATLAB File Exchange code “simCTMC.m” (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%