Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3018610.3018619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BliStrTune: hierarchical invention of theorem proving strategies

Abstract: Inventing targeted proof search strategies for specific problem sets is a difficult task. State-of-the-art automated theorem provers (ATPs) such as E allow a large number of userspecified proof search strategies described in a rich domain specific language. Several machine learning methods that invent strategies automatically for ATPs were proposed previously. One of them is the Blind Strategymaker (BliStr), a system for automated invention of ATP strategies.In this paper we introduce BliStrTune -a hierarchica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistent use of symbol names across the MPTP corpus is crucial for our symbol-based learning methods. We evaluate ATP performance with a goodperforming baseline E strategy, denoted S, which was previously optimized [17] on Mizar problems (see Appendix A for details). All experiments were run on a server with 36 hyperthreading Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz cores, with 755 GB of memory available in total.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistent use of symbol names across the MPTP corpus is crucial for our symbol-based learning methods. We evaluate ATP performance with a goodperforming baseline E strategy, denoted S, which was previously optimized [17] on Mizar problems (see Appendix A for details). All experiments were run on a server with 36 hyperthreading Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz cores, with 755 GB of memory available in total.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mizar theorem YELLOW 5:36 14 states De Morgan's laws for Boolean lattices: Using 32 related proofs results in 2220 clauses placed on the watchlists. The dynamically guided proof search takes 5218 (nontrivial) given clause loops done in 2 s and the resulting ATP proof is 436 inferences long.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their advanced knowledge-based proof finding is an enigma, which is unlikely to be deciphered and programmed completely manually in near future.On large corpora such as Flyspeck, Mizar and Isabelle, the ATP progress has been mainly due to learning how to select the most relevant knowledge, based on many previous proofs [10,12,1,2]. Learning from many proofs has also recently become a very useful method for automated finding of parameters of ATP strategies [22,9,19,16], and for learning of sequences of tactics in interactive theorem provers (ITPs) [7]. Several experiments with the compact leanCoP [18] system have recently shown that directly using trained machine learner for internal clause selection can significantly prune the search space and solve additional problems [24,11,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%