2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10596-020-09984-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block preconditioners for mixed-dimensional discretization of flow in fractured porous media

Abstract: In this paper, we are interested in an efficient numerical method for the mixed-dimensional approach to modeling single-phase flow in fractured porous media. The model introduces fractures and their intersections as lower-dimensional structures, and the mortar variable is used for flow coupling between the matrix and fractures. We consider a stable mixed finite element discretization of the problem, which results in a parameter-dependent linear system. For this, we develop block preconditioners based on the we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, if the linear system is to be solved by iterative methods, traditional preconditioners cannot be expected to perform well, and specialized methods may be preferable. Preconditioners for mixed-dimensional problems are an immature research field, see however [66,67] for examples on how PorePy can be combined with dedicated solvers for mixeddimensional problems.…”
Section: Solvers and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if the linear system is to be solved by iterative methods, traditional preconditioners cannot be expected to perform well, and specialized methods may be preferable. Preconditioners for mixed-dimensional problems are an immature research field, see however [66,67] for examples on how PorePy can be combined with dedicated solvers for mixeddimensional problems.…”
Section: Solvers and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study exposed the relative strengths and weaknesses between the participating methods, both in terms of accuracy and computational cost. After the publication of the results, these benchmark cases have been widely applied by the scientific community in testing numerical methods and new simulation tools ( Arrarás et al, 2019;Budisa and Hu, 2019;Köppel et al, 2019a;2019b;Odsaeter et al, 2019;Schädle et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15) where c 1,\frakq , c 1,\frakp , c 2,\frakq , and c 2,\frakp are positive constants independent of discretization and physical parameters. Following [13,27] and using Theorem 6.2 and (6.12), the condition number of \scrM D \scrA can be directly estimated as \kappa (\scrM D \scrA ) \leq \beta c 2 \gamma c 1 for c 2 = max\{ c 2,\frakq , c 2,\frakp \} and c 1 = min\{ c 1,\frakq , c 1,\frakp \} . Again, if \beta , \gamma , c 1 , and c 2 are independent of the discretization and physical parameters, then \scrM D is a robust preconditioner as well.…”
Section: Block Preconditioners Based On Auxiliary Space Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have recently been proposed in the context of preconditioners for fracture flow problems, in both an equidimensional setting [31] and mixeddimensional formulations [6,8,13]. Similar to [13], we design robust block preconditioners based on the well-posedness of the discrete PDEs using the framework developed in [26,27]. In this work, on the other hand, the mixed-dimensional nodal auxiliary space preconditioners are proposed to invert one of the diagonal blocks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%