2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block shear strength of cold-formed austenitic stainless steel (304 type) welded connection with base metal fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee et al (2019d) confirmed the critical section line of the welded connections of STS304, and the stress distribution at the line was confirmed through experimental and analytical studies on block shear behaviour of base metal fracture welded joints made of austenitic stainless steel STS304 (average mechanical properties: Fy = 262.34 MPa, Fu = 725.56 MPa, Fu/Fy = 2.76, elongation = 75.14%, nominal plate thickness = 3.0 mm), and the following equation (8) was proposed. The tensile stress factor of 1.35, which is higher than the value of 1.25 for carbon steel welded connections presented by previous studies (Topkaya (2004, 2007) and Oosterhof and Driver (2010) in the tensile fracture compared to the material tensile strength (Fu), and the shear stress factor of 1.15 for the average value of the yield stress and tensile strength of the material in the shear fracture region were also presented.…”
Section: Comparison Of Test Strength and Prediction By Current Design...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lee et al (2019d) confirmed the critical section line of the welded connections of STS304, and the stress distribution at the line was confirmed through experimental and analytical studies on block shear behaviour of base metal fracture welded joints made of austenitic stainless steel STS304 (average mechanical properties: Fy = 262.34 MPa, Fu = 725.56 MPa, Fu/Fy = 2.76, elongation = 75.14%, nominal plate thickness = 3.0 mm), and the following equation (8) was proposed. The tensile stress factor of 1.35, which is higher than the value of 1.25 for carbon steel welded connections presented by previous studies (Topkaya (2004, 2007) and Oosterhof and Driver (2010) in the tensile fracture compared to the material tensile strength (Fu), and the shear stress factor of 1.15 for the average value of the yield stress and tensile strength of the material in the shear fracture region were also presented.…”
Section: Comparison Of Test Strength and Prediction By Current Design...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The block shear strength of steel connections has been investigated experimentally and numerically by many researchers. A variety of strength equations have been reported in the literature (Birkemore and Gilmor, 1978; Cho et al, 2021c; Driver et el., 2006a; Dobrić et al, 2021d; Kim et al, 2020c; Lee et al, 2017b; Lee et al, 2018e; Lee et al, 2019d; Lin et al, 2022e; Maleki and Ghaderi-Garekani, 2020d; Teh and Clements, 2012b). Stainless-steel design specifications are available from sources such as the European code (EN 1993-1-4) (EC, 2015a), the American code (ASCE) (2002), the Australian/New Zealand code (AS/NZS 4673) (2001), the Korean code (KDS 41 30 40) (2022b) and the Japanese code (SSBA) (2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the structural design standards for stainless steel structural members are not yet available. In Korea, recently, many researchers have performed studies on structural behaviors, such as fracture mode and ultimate strength of bolted and welded connections of thin-walled (cold-formed) stainless steel plates through experimental and analytical methods [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%