2011
DOI: 10.1080/10556781003623891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block-structured quadratic programming for the direct multiple shooting method for optimal control

Abstract: Abstract. In this contribution we address the efficient solution of optimal control problems of dynamic processes with many controls. Such problems arise, e.g., from the outer convexification of integer control decisions. We treat this optimal control problem class using the direct multiple shooting method to discretize the optimal control problem. The resulting nonlinear problems are solved using sequential quadratic programming methods. We review the classical condensing algorithm that preprocesses the large… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We employed this method to solve a partially convexified and relaxed mixed-integer optimal control problem. The results reported in [34] indicate a significant reduction of the computational effort compared to the classical condensing method. The described linear algebra techniques however lack exploitation of simple bounds and matrix update procedures are not provided.…”
Section: Relation To Own Workmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We employed this method to solve a partially convexified and relaxed mixed-integer optimal control problem. The results reported in [34] indicate a significant reduction of the computational effort compared to the classical condensing method. The described linear algebra techniques however lack exploitation of simple bounds and matrix update procedures are not provided.…”
Section: Relation To Own Workmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We propose for the first time update procedures to this factorization for all kinds of active set changes that may occur when solving a QP with the presented block structure. These updates improve the run time complexity to O(mn 2 ) as compared to O(mn 3 ) in [34]. They are based on well established results by Gill and Golub [23] for Cholesky and QR factorizations, and extend the techniques commonly used in dense null-space active set QP solvers, cf.…”
Section: New Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations