BlockBlend: An Interoperable Decentralized Framework for Court Excellence

Khairwal, NeerajKumari; Shah, Dhaval

doi:10.1109/icast55766.2022.10039669

Cited by 1 publication

(6 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As such, governments worldwide have recognised the importance of security and privacy in BC adoption. Efforts include combating data fraud and manipulation in Brazil (Silva, 2020); managing private keys for transaction security in China (Song et al, 2022); ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and availability in India (Khairwal & Shah, 2022); addressing data security through division of work and personalised privacy in Bangladesh and the UK (Majumdar et al, 2020;Shahaab et al, 2023); using asymmetric key cryptography and selective disclosure for data protection (Habib et al, 2023); and implementing mechanisms such as encrypted transactions and digital IDs for sensitive information safeguarding (Gao et al, 2021;Rizal Batubara et al, 2019).…”

Section: Security and Privacy For Data Integrity And Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, many governments have also administered robust measures to ensure the integrity and validity of information, such as validation methods for detecting alterations in election results and intervention mechanisms for rectifying erroneous data input in alliance chains (Song et al, 2022;Vatsaraj et al, 2021). The implementation of data validation mechanisms also safeguards the authenticity and precision of judicial data, while the consolidation of data at a central hierarchy enhances the integrity of land records and cadastral mapping (Khairwal & Shah, 2022;Thakur et al, 2020). Governments also facilitate data verification within consortia (Shahaab et al, 2023), guarantee the immutability and dependability of data in customs processes (Rukanova et al, 2021), and employ certificate validation features to authenticate land certificates (Kusuma et al, 2022).…”

Section: Security and Privacy For Data Integrity And Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In governance areas, decentralisation plays a crucial role in the adoption of BCT by governments. Notable examples include the Thai FDA's decentralised system (Thoppae & Praneetpolgrang, 2021), the proposed complete decentralisation of the Indian court system (Khairwal & Shah, 2022), and the decentralised design of the Malaysian blockchain for higher education institutions (Junejo et al, 2022). Estonia and Norway have also utilised decentralisation to foster citizen trust by employing evoting and partially decentralised software (Semenzin et al, 2022;Vladucu et al, 2023).…”

Section: Collaboration and Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sri Lanka is exploring a JavaScript-based voting system (Wattegama et al, 2021), while Pakistan focuses on reliable e-voting solutions (Danwar et al, 2022). Akaba et al (2020) propose a framework for blockchain-based procurement in Nigeria, and Khairwal and Shah (2022) introduce the Blockbend model for the Indian court system. Estonia's digital infrastructure relies on "e-ID," "X-Road," and "KSI Blockchain" (Semenzin et al, 2022), while Russia adopts Waves' blockchain e-voting system (Vladucu et al, 2023).…”

Section: Technological Readiness and Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Russia, the use of blockchain for electronic interaction between the government and healthcare organisations enhances reliability, highlighting the need for a strong infrastructure (Przhedetskiy et al, 2019). Then, organisations need to maintain the scalability and performance of the infrastructure, as seen in many examples like in polling system (Wattegama et al, 2021), court system (Khairwal & Shah, 2022), land registry (Majumdar et al, 2020;Thakur et al, 2020), and many more (Alsaed et al, 2021;Gao et al, 2021;Ramazhamba & Venter, 2023;Shahaab et al, 2023).…”

Section: Technological Readiness and Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Unveiling Roadblocks and Mapping Solutions for Blockchain Adoption by Governments: A Systematic Literature Review

Setiawan Wibowo,

Yazid

2023

IJIKM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim/Purpose: Blockchain technology (BCT) has emerged as a potential catalyst for transforming government institutions and services, yet the adoption of blockchain in governments faces various challenges, for which previous studies have yet to provide practical solutions. Background: This study aims to identify and analyse barriers, potential solutions, and their relations in implementing BC for governments through a systematic literature review (SLR). The authors grouped the challenges based on the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework while exercising a thematic grouping for the solutions, followed by a comprehensive mapping to unveil the relationship between challenges and solutions. Methodology: This study employs the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 methodology, combined with the tollgate method, to improve the quality of selected articles. The authors further administer a three-level approach (open coding, axial coding, and selective coding) to analyse the challenges and solutions from the articles. Contribution: The authors argue that this study enriches the existing literature on BC adoption, particularly in the government context, by providing a comprehensive framework to analyse and address the unique challenges and solutions, thus contributing to the development of new theories and models for future research in BC adoption in government settings and fostering deeper exploration in the field. Findings: The authors have unveiled 40 adoption challenges categorised using the TOE framework. The most prevalent technological challenges include security concerns and integration & interoperability, while cultural resistance, lack of support and involvement, and employees’ capability hinder adoption at the organisational level. Notably, the environmental dimension lacks legal and standard frameworks. The study further unveils 28 potential solutions, encompassing legal frameworks, security and privacy measures, collaboration and governance, technological readiness and infrastructure, and strategic planning and adoption. The authors of the study have further mapped the solutions to the identified challenges, revealing that the establishment of legal frameworks stands out as the most comprehensive solution. Recommendations for Practitioners: Our findings provide a big picture regarding BC adoption for governments around the globe. This study charts the problems commonly encountered by government agencies and presents proven solutions in their wake. The authors endeavour practitioners, particularly those in governments, to embrace our findings as the cornerstone of BC/BCT adoption. These insights can aid practitioners in identifying existing or potential obstacles in adopting BC, pinpointing success factors, and formulating strategies tailored to their organisations. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers could extend this study by making an in-depth analysis of challenges or solutions in specific types of countries, such as developed and developing countries, as the authors believe this approach would yield more insights. Researchers could also test, validate, and verify the mapping in this study to improve the quality of the study further and thus can be a great aid for governments to adopt BC/BCT fully. Impact on Society: This study provides a comprehensive exploration of BC adoption in the government context, offering detailed explanations and valuable insights that hold significant value for government policymakers and decision-makers, serving as a bedrock for successful implementation by addressing roadblocks and emphasising the importance of establishing a supportive culture and structure, engaging stakeholders, and addressing security and privacy concerns, ultimately enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of BC adoption in government institutions and services. Future Research: Future research should address the limitations identified in this study by expanding the scope of the literature search to include previously inaccessible sources and exploring alternative frameworks to capture dynamic changes and contextual factors in BC adoption. Additionally, rigorous scrutiny, review, and testing are essential to establish the practical and theoretical validity of the identified solutions, while in-depth analyses of country-specific and regional challenges will provide valuable insights into the unique considerations faced by different governments.

show abstract