2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20195678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockchain and Demand Response: Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Energy Transactions Privacy

Abstract: Nowadays, the adoption of demand response programs is still lagging due to the prosumers’ lack of awareness, fear of losing control and privacy of energy data, etc. Programs decentralization, by adopting promising technologies such as blockchain, may bring significant advantages in terms of transparency, openness, improved control, and increased active participation of prosumers. Nevertheless, even though in general the transparency of the public blockchain is a desirable feature in the energy domain, the pros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the cost, in terms of gas consumption, and transaction throughput limitations another challenge in a real work setting is related to data privacy on one hand and the system auditability and tracking on the other hand. For example, to fulfil the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements [66] in Europe techniques like zero-knowledge proof [67] may need to be considered. Also, the GDPR can make difficult the integration of the blockchain system with other public health and location services.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the cost, in terms of gas consumption, and transaction throughput limitations another challenge in a real work setting is related to data privacy on one hand and the system auditability and tracking on the other hand. For example, to fulfil the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements [66] in Europe techniques like zero-knowledge proof [67] may need to be considered. Also, the GDPR can make difficult the integration of the blockchain system with other public health and location services.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the proposed method is suitable not only for remote biometric verification systems but also for any FE-based privacy-preserving applications where the evaluated function is an inner product and one of the two inputs of the inner product is entered offline [ 35 , 36 ]. Furthermore, the proposed method can be applied not only to FE-based systems but also to the other systems involving inner-pairing products, such as non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more times the pairing is called, the more gain is obtained in the execution time, at the small expense of memory to store the precomputed elements. Recently, the pairing operations are being adopted as a crucial operation for many applications, such as privacy-preserving applications [ 35 , 36 ] and non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For EMSs, several results have been obtained (see, e.g., [13], [22], [23]). For also DR, several results have been obtained (see, e.g., [14], [24]). However, to the best of our knowledge, applications of a blockchain to a distributed EMS with DR have not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%