2019
DOI: 10.3389/fbloc.2019.00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockchain and Public Record Keeping: Of Temples, Prisons, and the (Re)Configuration of Power

Abstract: This paper discusses blockchain technology as a public record keeping system, linking record keeping to power of authority, veneration (temples), and control (prisons) that configure and reconfigure social, economic, and political relations. It discusses blockchain technology as being constructed as a mechanism to counter institutions and social actors that currently hold power, but whom are nowadays often viewed with mistrust. It explores claims for blockchain as a record keeping force of resistance to those … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Crypto-anarchists, or techno-determinists, see distributed ledgers as unseating government (Atzori, 2015). However, others see a significant role for government alongside distributed ledgers in creating and preserving trustworthy records on evidence of rights, entitlements, and actions as distributed ledgers provide new ways to record information (Lemieux, 2019). Legal scholars have pointed out how law and legal infrastructure is useful for blockchain networks (Werbach, 2018), including for smart contracts (Cohney et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crypto-anarchists, or techno-determinists, see distributed ledgers as unseating government (Atzori, 2015). However, others see a significant role for government alongside distributed ledgers in creating and preserving trustworthy records on evidence of rights, entitlements, and actions as distributed ledgers provide new ways to record information (Lemieux, 2019). Legal scholars have pointed out how law and legal infrastructure is useful for blockchain networks (Werbach, 2018), including for smart contracts (Cohney et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, questions arise regarding the ability of blockchain systems to facilitate the archival function of data preservation over time (Lemieux, 2017(Lemieux, , 2019. For example, in blockchain land administration projects, original records are not stored on the system but hashes of the data (Lemieux, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study recommended that records managers determine record-keeping requirements before developing a business application using blockchain and that these considerations must be included from the start because of the fixed nature of blockchains. Lemieux (2019) discussed blockchain technology as a public record-keeping system, linking record-keeping to power of authority, veneration (temples) and control (prisons) that configure and reconfigure social, economic and political relations. It discusses blockchain technology as being constructed as a mechanism to counter institutions and social actors that currently hold power, but who are nowadays often viewed with mistrust.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%