2023
DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2023.2230702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Blockchain in government: toward an evaluation framework”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…mentioned different public values that could be potentially yielded from the implementation of blockchain-driven platforms in various public sector areas, such as the generation of democratic participation in using electronic voting platforms, for example, in political and administrative contexts, and decentralized tools to ensure trust and control in public institutional contexts (AlAbri et al, 2022;Benabdallah et al, 2022;Cagigas et al, 2023;Taş & Tanrıöver, 2020;Verma & Sheel, 2022), better management of municipal services in the public sector and promotion of public sector innovations (Abdullah & Jusoh, 2022;Alexopoulos et al, 2019;França et al, 2020;Ghazal et al, 2022;Shari & Malip, 2022;Warkentin & Orgeron, 2020), automation of public information processes (Kassen, 2022;Li & Liang, 2022;Mohamed et al, 2022;Roth et al, 2023;Tailor et al, 2022), increased level of cybersecurity in the financial sector (Aydın & Yükçü, 2022;Mahmood et al, 2022;Nelaturu et al, 2022;Pennino et al, 2022;Sarathy, 2022), collaboration and transparency in advancing more efficient data management and promotion of decentralized information infrastructure platforms in technological contexts (Benchaya Gans et al, 2022;Cila et al, 2020;Inwood & Zappavigna, 2023;Ning et al, 2021;Shuaib et al, 2021). A number of academic works were also concentrated on explaining the phenomena of blockchain per se through the prism of theoretical benefits and challenges it could bring to different sectors of the economy (Arbabi et al, 2022;Habib et al, 2022;Khan, Malik, et al, 2022;Li et al, 2023;Yavuz, 2022) (see Table 1).…”
Section: Academic Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…mentioned different public values that could be potentially yielded from the implementation of blockchain-driven platforms in various public sector areas, such as the generation of democratic participation in using electronic voting platforms, for example, in political and administrative contexts, and decentralized tools to ensure trust and control in public institutional contexts (AlAbri et al, 2022;Benabdallah et al, 2022;Cagigas et al, 2023;Taş & Tanrıöver, 2020;Verma & Sheel, 2022), better management of municipal services in the public sector and promotion of public sector innovations (Abdullah & Jusoh, 2022;Alexopoulos et al, 2019;França et al, 2020;Ghazal et al, 2022;Shari & Malip, 2022;Warkentin & Orgeron, 2020), automation of public information processes (Kassen, 2022;Li & Liang, 2022;Mohamed et al, 2022;Roth et al, 2023;Tailor et al, 2022), increased level of cybersecurity in the financial sector (Aydın & Yükçü, 2022;Mahmood et al, 2022;Nelaturu et al, 2022;Pennino et al, 2022;Sarathy, 2022), collaboration and transparency in advancing more efficient data management and promotion of decentralized information infrastructure platforms in technological contexts (Benchaya Gans et al, 2022;Cila et al, 2020;Inwood & Zappavigna, 2023;Ning et al, 2021;Shuaib et al, 2021). A number of academic works were also concentrated on explaining the phenomena of blockchain per se through the prism of theoretical benefits and challenges it could bring to different sectors of the economy (Arbabi et al, 2022;Habib et al, 2022;Khan, Malik, et al, 2022;Li et al, 2023;Yavuz, 2022) (see Table 1).…”
Section: Academic Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%