2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55911-7_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blocking Independent Sets for H-Free Graphs via Edge Contractions and Vertex Deletions

Abstract: Citation for published item:ulusmD hni¤ el nd iouleuD ghristophe nd iesD fernrd @PHIUA 9floking independent sets for rEfree grphs vi edge ontrtions nd vertex deletionsF9D in heory nd epplitions of wodels of gomputtionD IRth ennul gonferene @ewg PHIUA X fernD witzerlndD epril PHEPPD PHIU Y proeedingsF ghmX pringerD ppF RUHERVQF veture xotes in gomputer ieneF @IHIVSAF Further information on publisher's website:Publisher's copyright statement:The nal publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.100… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexities of Vertex Deletion Blocker(χ) and Contraction Blocker(χ) are known for H-free graphs if H is connected [10]. As a consequence of our results for k = d = 1, we can complete these two classifications for all graphs H, just as we did in a previous paper [11] for π = α (independence number) and π = ω (clique number), except for the case when π = ω, S = {ec} and H = C 3 + P 1 . The Edge Deletion Blocker(χ) problem is known [1] to be polynomial-time solvable for threshold graphs and NP-hard for cobipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The complexities of Vertex Deletion Blocker(χ) and Contraction Blocker(χ) are known for H-free graphs if H is connected [10]. As a consequence of our results for k = d = 1, we can complete these two classifications for all graphs H, just as we did in a previous paper [11] for π = α (independence number) and π = ω (clique number), except for the case when π = ω, S = {ec} and H = C 3 + P 1 . The Edge Deletion Blocker(χ) problem is known [1] to be polynomial-time solvable for threshold graphs and NP-hard for cobipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Such problems are called blocker problems, as the vertices or edges involved "block" some desirable graph property (such as being colorable with only a few colors). Over the last few years, blocker problems have been well studied, see for instance [1,2,3,4,5,9,10,11,12]. In these papers the set S consists of a single operation that is either a vertex deletion vd, edge deletion ed, or edge contraction ec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for a given graph G and integer k ≥ 0, the S-Blocker(π) problem asks if G can be modified into a graph G by using at most k operations from S so that π(G ) ≤ π(G) − d for some given threshold d ≥ 0. Over the last few years, the S-Blocker(π) problem has been well studied, see for instance [1,2,3,7,9,19,20,21,22,23]. If S consists of a single operation that is either a vertex deletion or edge contraction, then S-Blocker(π) is called Vertex Deletion Blocker(π) or Contraction Blocker(π), respectively.…”
Section: Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A blocker problem asks whether given a graph G, a graph a parameter π, a set O of one or more graph operations and an integer k ≥ 1, G can be transformed into a graph H such that π(H) ≤ π(G) − d for some threshold d ≥ 1, by using at most k operations from O. These problems are so called because the set of vertices or edges involved can be seen as "blocking" the parameter π. Identifying such sets may provide important information on the structure of the input graph: for instance, if π = α, k = d = 1 and O = {vertex deletion}, then the problem is equivalent to testing whether the input graph contains a vertex which belongs to every maximum independent set [20]. While the set O generally consists of a single operation (namely vertex deletion, edge deletion, edge addition or edge contraction), a variety of parameters have been considered in the literature including the chromatic number [2,5,6,19,21], the stability number [1,20], the clique number [16,17], the matching number [3,25], domination-like parameters [7,9,10,11,12,18] and others [4,13,14,22,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%