1971
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910070206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blocking of cell‐mediated tumor immunity by sera from patients with growing neoplasms

Abstract: Blood lymphocytes from tumor patients can specifically destroy cultivated neoplastic cells of the same histological origin as the tumors of the lymphocyte donors, irrespective of whether or not the donors have symptoms of growing tumor.The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether sera from tumor patients could block the cytotoxic effect of lymphocytes immune to the specific antigens of the respective neoplasms. A wide variety of tumors were included in the tests, namely malignant melanomas, carc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
61
1
3

Year Published

1971
1971
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
61
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, one may visualize the blocking factors as antigen-antibody complexes, capable of acting on the target cells, the lymphocytes, or both, any action on the lymphocytes having to be of a temporary nature to account for the finding that lymphocytes from tumor-bearing individuals are specifically reactive in vitro. The second hypothesis is more compatible than the first one with the lack of detectable blocking activity in sera from mice whose (Moloney) virus-induced sarcomas have regressed (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), from rabbits whose (Shope) papillomas have regressed (17), and from mice and rats whose methylcholanthrene-induced and (polyoma) virus-induced sarcomas, respectively, have been removed (18), although such sera do contain antibodies that can bind to the respective type of tumor (16,18) This paper describes experiments with blocking sera from animals bearing progressively growing primary sarcomas induced by Moloney virus or transplanted methyleholanthrene-induced sarcoma (MCA-1050) isografts. The basic plan of the experiments was to try breaking up hypothetical antigen-antibody complexes by subjecting blocking sera to low pH, and subsequently separating their two components by ultrafiltration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, one may visualize the blocking factors as antigen-antibody complexes, capable of acting on the target cells, the lymphocytes, or both, any action on the lymphocytes having to be of a temporary nature to account for the finding that lymphocytes from tumor-bearing individuals are specifically reactive in vitro. The second hypothesis is more compatible than the first one with the lack of detectable blocking activity in sera from mice whose (Moloney) virus-induced sarcomas have regressed (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), from rabbits whose (Shope) papillomas have regressed (17), and from mice and rats whose methylcholanthrene-induced and (polyoma) virus-induced sarcomas, respectively, have been removed (18), although such sera do contain antibodies that can bind to the respective type of tumor (16,18) This paper describes experiments with blocking sera from animals bearing progressively growing primary sarcomas induced by Moloney virus or transplanted methyleholanthrene-induced sarcoma (MCA-1050) isografts. The basic plan of the experiments was to try breaking up hypothetical antigen-antibody complexes by subjecting blocking sera to low pH, and subsequently separating their two components by ultrafiltration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Progressive tumor growth in vivo, despite a strong cellmediated anti-tumor immunity demonstrable in vitro, has been attributed to a specific ability of the serum of tumorbearing individuals to prevent target cell destruction by immune lymphocytes (2,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12); the mechanisms of the protection may be similar to those of the in vivo phenomenon of immunological enhancement (13). Sera from tumor-bearing animals, but not from tumor-free ones, can also abrogate the migration inhibition seen when peritoneal cell suspensions from specifically immune donors are exposed to tumor-antigen extracts in vitro (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, specific cell mediated immunity (CMI) has been demonstrated in human patients towards antigens of their own tumours, by lymphocyte cytotoxicity (Hellstr6m et al, 1968, 197 la), lymphocyte transformation (Vanky et al, 1971) and macrophage migration inhibition (Andersen, Bendixen and Schi0dt, 1969). Circulating anti-tumour antibodies have been detected by several methods, notably immunofluorescence (Lewis et al, 1969) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (Hellstrom et al, 1968); antibody-like blocking factors (BF), which interfere with CMI, are now well known in association with tumour growth (Hellstrom et al, 1971b(Hellstrom et al, , 1973Halliday, 1972;Hellstrom and Hellstrom, 1973a, b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that they are most often insufficient to adequately control the malignant cell proliferation. Interference of humoral factors with the cell-mediated response of the patient to his neoplasm has been proposed as an explanation ofthe failure ofthe immume system to control tumor growth, and this is supported by the demonstration in vitro of a specific blocking of lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity by the serum of individuals with growing tumors (10,14,15). There is evidence that serum blocking factors may consist of immune complexes (16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%