1978
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(78)90080-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood alcohol level and caloric intake in the gravid rat as a function of diurnal period, trimester, and vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that maternal malnutrition increases (Testar et al, 1986), has no effect (Goad et al, 1984), or even decreases (Ribeiro-da-Silva et al, 1994) the embryo-fetal developmental disturbances caused by ethanol in the offspring. Studies of ethanol-exposed pregnancy where a pair-fed group has been included to compensate for a (postulated) dietary restriction of the mother have not reported increased somatic malformation rate (Catlin et al, 1993;Goad et al, 1984) or other types of developmental damage (Henderson et al, 1995;Inselman et al, 1985;Martin et al, 1978;Miller and Dow-Edwards, 1988;Polache et al, 1996;Seyoum and Persaud, 1997;Zhou et al, 2001) in the pair-fed group; however, some of the studies have found decreased body weight of the offspring (Goad et al, 1984;Middaugh et al, 1988;Ribeiro-da-Silva et al, 1994;Testar et al, 1986). Therefore, the growth retardation, but not the malformations, of the offspring may be partly associated with a maternal nutritional imbalance in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that maternal malnutrition increases (Testar et al, 1986), has no effect (Goad et al, 1984), or even decreases (Ribeiro-da-Silva et al, 1994) the embryo-fetal developmental disturbances caused by ethanol in the offspring. Studies of ethanol-exposed pregnancy where a pair-fed group has been included to compensate for a (postulated) dietary restriction of the mother have not reported increased somatic malformation rate (Catlin et al, 1993;Goad et al, 1984) or other types of developmental damage (Henderson et al, 1995;Inselman et al, 1985;Martin et al, 1978;Miller and Dow-Edwards, 1988;Polache et al, 1996;Seyoum and Persaud, 1997;Zhou et al, 2001) in the pair-fed group; however, some of the studies have found decreased body weight of the offspring (Goad et al, 1984;Middaugh et al, 1988;Ribeiro-da-Silva et al, 1994;Testar et al, 1986). Therefore, the growth retardation, but not the malformations, of the offspring may be partly associated with a maternal nutritional imbalance in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%