1980
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780180085010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Alcohol Level Discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with previous results, our study suggests that FHP individuals may not detect their growing level of intoxication compared to FHN. This is compatible with prior data on drinking behavior in FHP (Lipscomb and Nathan 1980; Lansky et al 1978). However, our results also indicate that FHN individuals are more vulnerable to impair-mentin Go/No-Go performance evenbylow levels ofNMDA receptor blockade—suggesting that they may be more likely to have problems with driving and other critical aspects of behavioral control at modest levels of intoxication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Together with previous results, our study suggests that FHP individuals may not detect their growing level of intoxication compared to FHN. This is compatible with prior data on drinking behavior in FHP (Lipscomb and Nathan 1980; Lansky et al 1978). However, our results also indicate that FHN individuals are more vulnerable to impair-mentin Go/No-Go performance evenbylow levels ofNMDA receptor blockade—suggesting that they may be more likely to have problems with driving and other critical aspects of behavioral control at modest levels of intoxication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This upregulation in NMDA-R function might increase the risk for heavy drinking by decreasing unpleasant effects of ethanol and reducing cues that normally serve to help people regulate their drinking (Krystal et al, 2003a). The latter part of this hypothesis is consistent with evidence that individuals tolerant to ethanol have difficulty accurately estimating their blood alcohol level, even when trained to do so (Lipscomb and Nathan, 1980). …”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, O'Malley & Maisto found that variation in BAC was a weaker predictor of self-perceived intoxication for FHP subjects than for FHN subjects. Contrary to the above findings, however, a study by Lipscomb & Nathan (1980) found no FHP-FHN differences in subjects' abilities to gauge their blood alcohol levels after various doses of alcohol.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 69%