2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01173.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood and bombs: the demand and use of blood following the London Bombings of 7 July 2005 – a retrospective review

Abstract: Mass casualty events (MCE) present health systems with a sudden demand on key services. The overall objective of this study was to describe the experience of the National Blood Service (NBS) following the largest UK MCE in recent times. Data was collated from the NBS database and directly from the hospitals involved. All data was collected immediately following the event and included: all blood components requested, issued and transfused in relation to the bombings, blood stock levels at the time and the injur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final step in planning demand was to apply a ‘hospital demand factor’ to all required estimates. There was approximately a three‐fold difference between hospital demand and patient requirement following the London bombings with a similar experience reported during MCEs elsewhere (Soffer et al , ; Glasgow et al , ). Despite this, the local shortages of blood components during an incident were realised as a possibility.…”
Section: Demand Planningsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final step in planning demand was to apply a ‘hospital demand factor’ to all required estimates. There was approximately a three‐fold difference between hospital demand and patient requirement following the London bombings with a similar experience reported during MCEs elsewhere (Soffer et al , ; Glasgow et al , ). Despite this, the local shortages of blood components during an incident were realised as a possibility.…”
Section: Demand Planningsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These are common place in military operations and amongst certain civilian populations, but have not been experienced on the same scale in the UK since the 2005 attacks (Rodoplu et al , ; Aylwin et al , ; Dann et al , ; Nelson et al , ). The lessons identified from that incident have been described previously (Glasgow et al , ). These attacks required a total of 338 U (unit) of RBCs across all treating units, with an average of 14·5 U per casualty receiving a transfusion and 6·1 U per patient triaged at scene as a priority one (P1) casualty (Hodgetts, ; Aylwin et al , ).…”
Section: Demand Planningmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…21,33 Restocking of the hospitals involved in a response is difficult or impossible during the early phases of the event. At least initially, hospitals must rely on the stocks already present before the event occurs ( Figure 15).…”
Section: Mass Casualty and Event Response Planningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many units have relied on restocking RBCs to manage demand in past MCEs. 39 This, however, has always been on a request-first basis from the TCs themselves. This approach risks delaying the delivery of RBCs, potentially missing the narrow window of opportunity for improving transfusion-related outcomes in these events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%