2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood biomarkers for sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

Rongna Lian,
Qianqian Liu,
Gengchen Jiang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomarkers are of tremendous importance for the prediction, diagnosis, and observation of the therapeutic success of common complex and multifactorial diseases. However, the common methods of clinical biochemistry are ineffective or have low efficacy for diagnosing senile diseases at early stages [28,57]. The predictive power of the traditional biomarkers used (e.g., plasma metabolites and body parameters) is apparently not sufficient for the reliable monitoring of stage-dependent pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarkers are of tremendous importance for the prediction, diagnosis, and observation of the therapeutic success of common complex and multifactorial diseases. However, the common methods of clinical biochemistry are ineffective or have low efficacy for diagnosing senile diseases at early stages [28,57]. The predictive power of the traditional biomarkers used (e.g., plasma metabolites and body parameters) is apparently not sufficient for the reliable monitoring of stage-dependent pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demographic affected by sarcopenia often presents a clinical convergence with individuals experiencing frailty, as the symptomatic criteria for diagnosing both conditions bear resemblance, particularly with sarcopenia aligning closely with the subtype of frailty known as physical frailty ( Kondoh and Kameda, 2023 ). A recent systematic review and meta-analysis undertook a comprehensive exploration of presently reported potential blood biomarkers associated with sarcopenia ( Lian et al, 2023 ). Despite the breadth of this review, the incorporated studies exhibited notable divergences due to disparities in research designs, leading to the revelation that the thirteen scrutinized biomarkers held low diagnostic efficacy for screening sarcopenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the breadth of this review, the incorporated studies exhibited notable divergences due to disparities in research designs, leading to the revelation that the thirteen scrutinized biomarkers held low diagnostic efficacy for screening sarcopenia. This underscores the importance of alternative methodologies, such as Mendelian randomization, which, unencumbered by confounding factors in observational studies, presents a promising avenue for the exploration and validation of novel biomarkers in this specific context ( Lian et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The underlying pathogenesis of sarcopenia remains unknown. Since dysregulated inflammatory response has been frequently reported to be associated to the reduction in muscle mass and physical function in adults with sarcopenia, inflammatory biomarkers may be used to understand the pathogenesis of sarcopenia, and provide early diagnosis and prognosis prediction [ 12 – 14 ]. For example, a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines have been proposed to decrease muscle mass by increasing muscle protein breakdown, and reduce muscle protein synthesis, leading to sarcopenia [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%