2016
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis

Abstract: Of the biomarkers that were subjected to meta-analysis, none consistently met the criteria for a replacement or triage diagnostic test. A subset of blood biomarkers could prove useful either for detecting pelvic endometriosis or for differentiating ovarian endometrioma from other benign ovarian masses, but there was insufficient evidence to draw meaningful conclusions. Overall, none of the biomarkers displayed enough accuracy to be used clinically outside a research setting. We also identified blood biomarkers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
218
0
16

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 362 publications
8
218
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the range of blood tests that have been evaluated, a reliable test has yet to be identified for the diagnosis of endometriosis [72, 73]. A change in levels of analytes, proteins, microRNAs, and other markers corresponding to a disease state could be the basis for identifying novel biomarkers.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Endometriosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the range of blood tests that have been evaluated, a reliable test has yet to be identified for the diagnosis of endometriosis [72, 73]. A change in levels of analytes, proteins, microRNAs, and other markers corresponding to a disease state could be the basis for identifying novel biomarkers.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Endometriosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, its effective treatment still remains a challenge . So far the quest for novel nonhormonal therapeutics has not been successful, and there is no single biomarker that has unequivocally been shown to be clinically useful in diagnosing endometriosis …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CA-125 is the serum biomarker that has been more extensively studied in the diagnosis of endometriosis, but it had not reached its full potential. Other serum markers such as CA19-9, interleukins 6, 8, and 10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha have also already been studied [12,13]. In comparative studies, those markers were not superior to CA-125 in relation to diagnostic performance in endometriosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%