“…From the total, 11 studies were appraised as having good quality ( 23 , 24 , 30 , 32 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 47 , 52 – 54 ), nine as fair quality ( 26 , 27 , 31 , 33 , 42 , 45 , 46 , 51 , 55 ), and 18 as poor quality ( 19 – 22 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 43 , 44 , 48 – 50 , 56 ). Since nearly all included studies had a cross-sectional design, the most frequent methodological limitations were the lack of temporal precedence, sufficient timeframe between exposure and outcome, and exposure being assessed only once.…”