2005
DOI: 10.1258/0022215053222752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood loss estimation in epistaxis scenarios

Abstract: Thirty-two members of staff from the Ear, Nose and Throat Department at Warrington General Hospital were asked to estimate blood loss in commonly encountered epistaxis scenarios. Results showed that once the measured volume was above 100 ml, visual estimation became grossly inaccurate. Comparison of medical and non-medical staff showed under-estimation was more marked in the non-medical group. Comparison of doctors versus nurses showed no difference in estimation, and no difference was found between grades of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the diagnosis of hemorrhage is of primary concern and the importance of the accurate estimation of blood loss is paramount to allowing the appropriate intervention by warning of impending hemorrhagic shock. Estimates of blood loss by paramedics [64], surgeons [65] and obstetricians and midwives [66] are often inaccurate and vary widely. Studies following vaginal [67] and abdominal delivery [68] show visual estimation of blood loss to be of limited clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the diagnosis of hemorrhage is of primary concern and the importance of the accurate estimation of blood loss is paramount to allowing the appropriate intervention by warning of impending hemorrhagic shock. Estimates of blood loss by paramedics [64], surgeons [65] and obstetricians and midwives [66] are often inaccurate and vary widely. Studies following vaginal [67] and abdominal delivery [68] show visual estimation of blood loss to be of limited clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Accurate visual estimation of cumulative blood loss forewarns of impending haemorrhagic shock. Estimates of blood loss by paramedics 10 and surgeons 11 are inaccurate, and studies following vaginal 12 and abdominal delivery 13 show visual estimation to be of limited clinical use. Menstrual pictograms to facilitate the assessment of menorrhagia in the field of gynaecology 14 have now been produced; however, little pictorial data yet exist to facilitate similar estimations of blood loss in obstetrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our case was unique in the sense that a haemangioma of the size smaller than a pea (5 mm 9 5 mm) could produce so much blood loss that the patient required transfusion [5]. Although the haemangiomatous mass was situated in the nasal cavity it hardly produced symptoms of frank epistaxis and the bleeding was mostly posterior producing symptoms of haemoptysis and haematemesis, and despite all investigations rigid endoscopy provided the relevant information and was helpful in treatment of the case [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%