2020
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Metal Levels and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Risk: A Prospective Cohort

Abstract: Objective Metals have been suggested as a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but only retrospective studies are available to date. We compared metal levels in prospectively collected blood samples from ALS patients and controls, to explore whether metals are associated with ALS mortality. Methods A nested ALS case–control study was conducted within the prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) cohort. Cases were identified through death certificates. We a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of these sensitivity analyses were in accordance with the IVW result. Therefore, the present study did not find evidence supporting any causal relationship between ALS and selenium, which is in accordance with the null association found between ALS and erythrocyte-bound selenium level in a recent prospective case-control study (Peters et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of these sensitivity analyses were in accordance with the IVW result. Therefore, the present study did not find evidence supporting any causal relationship between ALS and selenium, which is in accordance with the null association found between ALS and erythrocyte-bound selenium level in a recent prospective case-control study (Peters et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The questionnaire-based observational studies, which rely on self-reported information for the assessment of exposures, are subject to recall and selection biases (Filippini et al, 2020). The prospective case-control study design, on the other hand, is usually restricted by the modest number of cases enrolled, partly due to the low prevalence of ALS in the general population (Peters et al, 2020). Therefore, given the rarity of the disease and ethical issues, it is difficult to conduct unbiased association studies of ALS and selenium in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we leveraged the summary statistics from recent largescale GWAS datasets to probe the association between selenium exposure and the risk for ALS. The current evidence did not support any causal relationship between the two, which is in accordance with the null association found between ALS and erythrocyte-bound selenium level in a recent prospective casecontrol study [18]. However, given the modest number of valid IVs available for this analysis and the relatively low percentage of variance in selenium level explained by these IVs, the statistical power to detect any postulated causal association might be limited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, the questionnaire-based observational studies relying on self-reported information for the assessment of exposures are also subject to recall and selection biases [14]. The prospective case-control study design, on the other hand, is usually restricted by the modest number of cases enrolled, partly due to the low prevalence of ALS in general population [18]. Therefore, given the rarity of the disease and ethical issues, it is di cult to conduct unbiased environmental studies of ALS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, exposure to metals has been suggested to be a possible risk factor for ALS, but results are not conclusive. Studies show that cadmium and lead may be associated with an increased risk of developing ALS and zinc with a decreased risk based on pre-disease metal levels in blood, with lead having the strongest a priori connection [ 133 , 134 , 135 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%