Blood pressure decrease in elderly after isometric training: does lactate play a role?

Souza, Luiz Humberto Rodrigues; Corrêa, Hugo de Luca; Rosa, Thiago Santos; Neves, Rodrigo Vanerson Passos; Deus, Lysleine Alves; Olher, Rafael Reis; Vicente, Joyce Bomfim; Melo, Geiziane Leite Rodrigues; Barros, Carolina Fonseca de; Moraes, Vivian C.; Coelho, João Maurício de Oliveira; Peruchi, Luiz Henrique; Santos, Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos; Simões, Hebert Gustavo; Moraes, Milton Rocha

doi:10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7433

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies have reported reductions in resting blood pressure following isometric handgrip training in individuals without hypertension and hypertensive individuals with and without antihypertensive medication compared to a control (Badrov, Bartol, et al, 2013; Cahu Rodrigues et al, 2020; Carlson et al, 2016; Farah et al, 2018; Herrod et al, 2019; Millar et al, 2008, 2013; Ogbutor et al, 2019; Punia & Kulandaivelan, 2020; Ray & Carrasco, 2000; Souza et al, 2020; Taylor et al, 2003). However, other randomized controlled trials have observed no reduction in any resting blood pressure assessments after isometric handgrip training compared to a control group in medicated Stage 2 hypertensive adults (Pagonas et al, 2017; Stiller‐Moldovan et al, 2012).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Forty‐seven studies reported the chronic changes in resting blood pressure after isometric handgrip training (Ahmed et al, 2019; Allen et al, 2003; Alomari et al, 2010; Baddeley‐White et al, 2019; Badrov, Bartol, et al, 2013; Badrov, Horton, et al, 2013, 2016; Bank et al, 1998; Baross et al, 2017; Bentley et al, 2018; Cahu Rodrigues et al, 2020; Carlson et al, 2016; Correia et al, 2020; Dempster et al, 2018; Dobrosielski et al, 2009; Farah et al, 2018; Gandhi, 2016; Garg et al, 2014; Goessler et al, 2018; Herrod et al, 2019; Hess et al, 2016; Howden et al, 2002; Lara et al, 2015; McGowan et al, 2006; McGowan, Levy, et al, 2007; McGowan, Visocchi, et al, 2007; Millar et al, 2007, 2008, 2013; Mortimer & McKune, 2011; Ogbutor et al, 2019; Okamoto et al, 2020; Pagonas et al, 2017; Peters et al, 2006, Punia & Kulandaivelan, 2020; Ray & Carrasco, 2000; Saito et al, 2009; Sinoway et al, 1996; Somani et al, 2017, 2018; Somers et al, 1992; Souza et al, 2020; Stiller‐Moldovan et al, 2012; Taylor et al, 2003; Wiley et al, 1992; Yamagata & Sako, 2020; Zhang, 2003) (Table 2). In total, 22 studies included a nonexercise control group, three studies included a sham‐control group, one study provided a lifestyle modification program to both treatment and control groups, and 21 studies only had one or multiple isometric handgrip training groups.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, 22 studies included a nonexercise control group, three studies included a sham‐control group, one study provided a lifestyle modification program to both treatment and control groups, and 21 studies only had one or multiple isometric handgrip training groups. There were studies comparing the changes in resting blood pressure between sexes (Badrov et al, 2016; Somani et al, 2017), between Stage 1 hypertensives and Stage 2 hypertensives (Souza et al, 2020), between different exercise intensities (Hess et al, 2016), between bilateral and unilateral isometric handgrip training, (McGowan, Visocchi, et al, 2007; Millar et al, 2007), between isometric handgrip and knee extension training (Howden et al, 2002; Somani et al, 2018), between isometric handgrip and aerobic training (Baross et al, 2017; Goessler et al, 2018), between different handgrip devices (Baddeley‐White et al, 2019) and between home‐based and supervised training (Farah et al, 2018).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The impact of isometric handgrip exercise and training on health‐related factors: A review

Yamada

Spitz

Wong

et al. 2022

Clin Physio Funct Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Isometric handgrip exercise has been suggested to promote some health‐related factors (e.g., lowering blood pressure). However, there is a need to evaluate whether this type of exercise can be included as an option to elicit these health‐related outcomes. The purpose of the article was to systematically review the acute and chronic effects of isometric handgrip exercise on resting blood pressure, pain sensation, cognitive function and blood lipids and lipoproteins. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 89 studies met our inclusion criteria. Most randomized controlled trials (17/26) reported reductions in resting blood pressure (mostly systolic blood pressure) following isometric handgrip training. There were inconsistent results in isometric handgrip exercise‐induced hypotension (i.e., acute response). There was convincing evidence observed in randomized controlled trials (4/6) for isometric handgrip exercise‐induced hypoalgesia. Some randomized controlled trials (2/2) supported an improvement in memory performance, but not interference control (0/2), after a session of isometric handgrip exercise. None of the included studies found any effects of isometric handgrip training on blood lipids and lipoproteins. Isometric handgrip exercise appears to be an effective method to improve certain health‐related factors. The acute reductions in pain and blood pressure may share a similar central mechanism. However, training‐induced reductions in resting blood pressure may be driven by changes in the periphery. Additional work is needed to better understand if (and to what extent) isometric handgrip exercise (or training) influences cognitive function and blood lipids and lipoproteins.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The impact of isometric handgrip exercise and training on health‐related factors: A review

Yamada

Spitz

Wong

et al. 2022

Clin Physio Funct Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…30%–50% of maximal strength). Chronic training interventions, using low‐moderate intensity isometric handgrip exercise, have repeatedly observed reductions in resting blood pressure (Bentley et al, 2018; Jin et al, 2017; Kelley & Kelley, 2010; Loaiza‐Betancur & Chulvi‐Medrano, 2020; Souza et al, 2020). In contrast, there are only a few studies that have investigated the impact of isometric handgrip exercise on interference control.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of isometric handgrip exercise with or without blood flow restriction on interference control and feelings

Yamada

Song

Bell

et al. 2021

Clin Physio Funct Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether isometric handgrip exercise, with or without blood flow restriction, would alter interference control and feelings. 60 healthy young adults completed three experimental visits, consisting of four sets of 2 min isometric handgrip exercise, at 30% of maximal strength with or without blood flow restriction (50% of arterial occlusion pressure), or a non-exercise/timematched control. Exercise-induced feeling inventory and Stroop Color Word Test were performed at pre-and ~10-min post-exercise, respectively. Bayes factors (BF 10 ) quantified the evidence for or against the null. There were no changes or differences between conditions for interference control following exercise with or without blood flow restriction (Incongruent BF 10 : 0.155; Stroop Interference BF 10 : 0.082).There were also no differences in the error rate as well as no differences between conditions for changes in 'positivity' or 'revitalization'. Feelings of 'tranquility' were reduced relative to a control following exercise with (median δ [95% credible interval]: −0.74 (−1.05, −0.45), BF 10 : 5515.7) and without (median δ: −0.72 [−1.02, −0.41], BF 10 : 571.3) blood flow restriction. These changes were not different between exercise conditions. Feelings of 'physical exhaustion' were increased relative to a control following exercise without blood flow restriction (median δ: 0.35[0.09, 0.61], BF 10 :5.84). However, this increase was not different from the same exercise with blood flow restriction. These results suggest that 1) isometric handgrip exercise could be performed without impairing interference control, even when blood flow restriction is added, and that 2) changes in feelings occur independent of changes in interference control.

show abstract

Blood pressure decrease in elderly after isometric training: does lactate play a role?

Cited by 2 publications

References 28 publications

The impact of isometric handgrip exercise and training on health‐related factors: A review

The impact of isometric handgrip exercise and training on health‐related factors: A review

Effects of isometric handgrip exercise with or without blood flow restriction on interference control and feelings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About