1974
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.3.5931.600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Pressure in a Scottish Town

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood pressure variables were adjusted by regression for the significant covariates of age, sex, smoking, and physical exercise habit. Plasma potassium was adjusted for the following significant covariates: age (␤, 0.005; P Ͻ 0.001); sex (␤, 0.120; female K ϩ lower than male K ϩ ; P Ͻ 0.001); treatment with diuretics (␤, Ϫ0.272; P Ͻ 0.001); treatment with ACE inhibitors (␤, 0.083; P ϭ 0.008); and current smoking (␤, 0.052; P ϭ 0.029), which, as previously described by others, was associated with a higher plasma potassium level (11,21). Age, sex, and smoking explained 5.38% of the variability in plasma K ϩ , and drug therapy explained a further 5.93%, the majority of that effect being due to diuretics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Blood pressure variables were adjusted by regression for the significant covariates of age, sex, smoking, and physical exercise habit. Plasma potassium was adjusted for the following significant covariates: age (␤, 0.005; P Ͻ 0.001); sex (␤, 0.120; female K ϩ lower than male K ϩ ; P Ͻ 0.001); treatment with diuretics (␤, Ϫ0.272; P Ͻ 0.001); treatment with ACE inhibitors (␤, 0.083; P ϭ 0.008); and current smoking (␤, 0.052; P ϭ 0.029), which, as previously described by others, was associated with a higher plasma potassium level (11,21). Age, sex, and smoking explained 5.38% of the variability in plasma K ϩ , and drug therapy explained a further 5.93%, the majority of that effect being due to diuretics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Though there was a female preponderance in this group, there is no compelling evidence to suggest that lower arterial pressures could be ascribed to this [27]. While the difference is relatively small, any potential biological significance remains to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The sample size was determined using the nomogram described by Altman. 7 We used a standard deviation of 13 mm Hg diastolic from the Renfrew study, 8 assumed a 5 mm Hg difference to be clinically significant and chose a 5% significance level with a power of 85%. Only one of the clinicians was aware of the null hypothesis in an attempt to reduce observer bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%