2018
DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood pressure indices and cardiovascular disease mortality in persons with or without diabetes mellitus

Abstract: The association between SBP and CVD mortality risk is nonlinear but different in diabetes mellitus (U-shaped) and NON-DM (J-shaped), explaining why aggressive blood pressure lowering may have different outcomes in these two groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, our data showed that low on treatment DBP does not independently influence cardiovascular risk in patients allocated to intensive and standard blood pressure lowering strategies. These results are in line with the conclusions of similar studies 1114,27 . In that context, low on-treatment DBP should be considered as a marker of high cardiovascular risk rather than an independent risk factor 26 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, our data showed that low on treatment DBP does not independently influence cardiovascular risk in patients allocated to intensive and standard blood pressure lowering strategies. These results are in line with the conclusions of similar studies 1114,27 . In that context, low on-treatment DBP should be considered as a marker of high cardiovascular risk rather than an independent risk factor 26 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The J-shaped curve relationship between DBP and cardiovascular mortality was also observed after long-term follow-up in the analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III and Diabetes Heart Study performed by Gomadam et al . 27 Our multivariable Cox model showed that DBP was not a significant cofactor. Based on the data obtained from this study and previous studies, the evidence for a J-shaped relationship between DBP and cardiovascular risk is inconclusive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Abundant clinical data indicate a close correlation between the amplitude, frequency, and characteristic points of pulse waves and cardiovascular diseases [3]. By examining the relationship between pulse waves and various parameters of the cardiovascular system, it is possible to assess the health status of the human cardiovascular system [4]. Therefore, developing a device that is comfortable and capable of continuously monitoring human Micromachines 2024, 15, 659 2 of 18 pulse signals holds practical significance for the prevention and treatment of diseases such as hypertension and cardiovascular ailments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous large studies of the association of blood pressure with CVD in diabetes involved mainly Western populations [6 , 8 , 9] . Hypertension and diabetes are more common and frequently less well-controlled in China [17] , [18] , [19] ], and population differences are proposed in the underlying pathophysiology of T2D [20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large prospective observational studies [3 , 4] and randomised controlled trials [5] have consistently demonstrated that intensive control of blood pressure (target systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 120 mmHg) is associated with lower risks of CVD in the general population. However, the evidence is less clear among individuals with diabetes, with some studies reporting comparable risks to those in the general population [3 , 6 , 7] , while others have reported higher CVD [8 , 9] and all-cause [8] mortality risks at lower SBP levels (SBP < 130 mmHg [8] or < 120 mmHg [9] ). Furthermore, the large ACCORD BP trial failed to demonstrate any benefit of a SBP target of < 120 mmHg when compared with < 140 mmHg among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) [10] , with meta-analyses of trial data suggesting possible adverse CVD [11] and non-CVD [12] effects of intensive blood pressure lowering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%