2024
DOI: 10.3233/jad-230930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Pressure Variability and Plasma Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers in the SPRINT Trial

Isabel J. Sible,
Daniel A. Nation

Abstract: Background: Recent observational studies suggest higher blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau. Less is known about relationships in interventional cohorts with strictly controlled mean BP levels. Objective: Investigate the longitudinal relationship between BPV and change in plasma AD biomarkers under standard versus intensive BP treatment. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT trial, 457 participants (n = 206 in standar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the intensity of blood pressure treatment could be another relevant factor. Among individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease, higher BPV was associated with increased plasma total tau in the standard, but not intensive, blood pressure treatment group [ 30 ]. In our cohort of patients with overt cardiovascular disease, effect modification analyses might have revealed significant associations, although all patients were treated similarly according to current guidelines and differences between treatment groups would have likely been small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the intensity of blood pressure treatment could be another relevant factor. Among individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease, higher BPV was associated with increased plasma total tau in the standard, but not intensive, blood pressure treatment group [ 30 ]. In our cohort of patients with overt cardiovascular disease, effect modification analyses might have revealed significant associations, although all patients were treated similarly according to current guidelines and differences between treatment groups would have likely been small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%