1983
DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(83)90061-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood prolactin levels: Influence of age, menstrual cycle and oral contraceptives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The progressive increase of prolactin secre tion, starting from the time of ovulation, is in agreement with previous reports [10,19], and is reflected by the parallel increase of progesterone. Thus, the highest plateau lev els of both hormones are obtained imme diately before shedding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The progressive increase of prolactin secre tion, starting from the time of ovulation, is in agreement with previous reports [10,19], and is reflected by the parallel increase of progesterone. Thus, the highest plateau lev els of both hormones are obtained imme diately before shedding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Serum was stored at -2 0 °C until the time of assay, which was performed on the same occasion for all scrum samples from each single patient. The serum concen trations of FSH, LH, estradiol, progesterone and pro lactin were measured by established R1A procedures [10,11]. Each assay was performed in duplicate, and the intra-and interassay coefficients of variation were < 10% and < 15%, respectively.…”
Section: Blood Samples and Hormone Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1984) that the distribution of basal serum prolactin concentrations is skewed to the right at least among normal premenopausal women and that the 'normal' range for this population may need redefinition. On the other hand, when prolactin levels were compared to age-and sex-matched controls, as in the large cross-sectional studies of Davies et al Pansini et al (1983), no significant elevation of serum prolactin among patients taking oral contraceptives could be detected. Some of the apparent discrepancies in earlier studies on the effect of combination-type oral contraceptive agents on serum prolactin concentrations in normal premenopausal women could have been due to a failure to take this factor into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, among the larger studies reported recently, Reyniak et al (1980) found that about 30% of 123 subjects on oral contraceptives had 'hyperprolactinaemia', when hyperprolactinaemia was defined as any prolactin concentration above 20 ng/ml, a value presumably derived from the general population. On the other hand, when prolactin levels were compared to age-and sex-matched controls, as in the large cross-sectional studies of Davies et al Pansini et al (1983), no significant elevation of serum prolactin among patients taking oral contraceptives could be detected. Differences in the definition of hyperprolactinaemia, as well as in the oestrogen content of contraceptives employed and perhaps other factors, such as patient selection and time of blood sampling, probably account for the discrepant results among several other earlier studies (Abu-Fadil et al, 1976;Dericks-Tan et al, 1976;Spellacy et al, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation