The surface charge of nanoparticles or nanocarriers (NCs)
plays
a critical role in the vehicle function, distribution, and fate in
drug delivery applications. Flash NanoPrecipitation (FNP) is a platform
for producing block copolymer-stabilized NCs. We show that NC charge
(measured as the ζ-potential) can be continuously tuned from
+40 to −40 mV by using blends of neutral poly(styrene)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (PS-b-PEG)
with polyelectrolyte block copolymers, anionic poly(styrene)-block-poly(acrylic acid) (PS-b-PAA) or
cationic poly(styrene)-block-poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl
methacrylate) (PS-b-DMAEMA), while simultaneously
controlling NC diameters between 40 and 180 nm. The dense polymer
brush on the surface of these FNP NCs provides a better platform to
test NC surface charge effects on cellular interactions than NC systems
in which charge is applied onto hydrophobic surfaces. NC charge gradually
increases as more PS-b-PEG is replaced with a polyelectrolyte
stabilizer, where sparsely substituted NCs (1–20 wt %) have
nearly neutral (|ζ| < 5 mV) followed by a region where ζ-potential
increases with increasing polyelectrolyte substitution. The protein
binding to negatively charged NCs is low and equivalent to the adsorption
on PEG-coated NCs, which are normally considered as the gold standard
in “stealth” low protein adsorbing surfaces. In contrast,
as little as 1 mol % cationic polymer produces strong protein adsorption,
and cellular uptake, even though the ζ-potentials are still
near zero, |ζ| < 5 mV. Binding of the NCs to Tib67, HEK293T,
and HepG2 cells is distinct. While cationic NCs are taken up by all
cell lines, anionic NCs are only taken up by the macrophage-like Tib67
cells. These results are discussed in terms of the protein corona
differences on the NCs and the receptor differences between these
cell lines. This study shows that ζ-potential alone is inadequate
to predict the biological identity of an NC formed by protein corona
adsorption and interactions with different types of cells.