2014
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.655v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood, sweat and tears: non-invasive vs. non-disruptive DNA sampling for experimental biology

Abstract: PrePrints 2Note to the readers: this manuscript is currently under development. New versions will 22 be regularly uploaded on PeerJ pre-print. We welcome constructive comments. 24Blood, sweat and tears: non-invasive vs. non-disruptive 25

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preference of buccal cells to obtain DNA is also related to unavailability of medical staff required to collect blood, and provides sufficient DNA quantity and quality. It should also be noted that buccal swabs are less contaminated by proteins compared to other methods of collecting oral biological material, and thus they enable improved quality and quantity of DNA [ 54 , 55 ]. Six common SNPs of the FKBP5 gene (rs3800373, rs9470080, rs4713902, rs737054, rs1360780 and rs9296158) were genotyped with the allelic discrimination technique using validated and predesigned TaqMan ® SNP Genotyping Assays (C__27489960_10, C_____92160_10, C__30559929_10, C___1256778_10, C___8852038_10, and C___1256775_30, respectively) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, U.S.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preference of buccal cells to obtain DNA is also related to unavailability of medical staff required to collect blood, and provides sufficient DNA quantity and quality. It should also be noted that buccal swabs are less contaminated by proteins compared to other methods of collecting oral biological material, and thus they enable improved quality and quantity of DNA [ 54 , 55 ]. Six common SNPs of the FKBP5 gene (rs3800373, rs9470080, rs4713902, rs737054, rs1360780 and rs9296158) were genotyped with the allelic discrimination technique using validated and predesigned TaqMan ® SNP Genotyping Assays (C__27489960_10, C_____92160_10, C__30559929_10, C___1256778_10, C___8852038_10, and C___1256775_30, respectively) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, U.S.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…most fishes and frogs) monitoring reproductive activity can be achieved by destructive, injurious or non‐invasive methods (Table ) (Lefort et al . ). The extra mortality rate imposed by destructive sampling methods makes them undesirable for monitoring reproduction in rare and threatened species (Tsukamoto ; Wei et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Genetics plays a prominent role in conservation biology, particularly for investigating and developing solutions to problems of inbreeding and taxonomic uncertainty (Frankham 1995; Kohn et al 2006;Avise 2012;Frankham et al 2014). Conservation biology studies aim to sample with minimal impacts on the individual or population, particularly when working with rare or endangered species (Morin et al 1993; Taberlet and Luikart 1999; Riddle et al 2003; Lefort et al 2014). For genetic studies, this can be accomplished through non-lethal or non-invasive DNA sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "noninvasive sampling" has been widely applied to any sampling method that does not kill the animal (Morin and Woodruff 1996). Following Lefort et al (2014), Methods that make some contact with the animal, even if it is not perceptibly harmful (e.g. swabbing with a cotton swab), are considered here as "non-lethal" and distinguished from methods that avoid contact with the animal entirely and are therefore truly "non-invasive" (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%