1990
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800770208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood transfusion and survival following surgery for prostatic carcinoma

Abstract: Blood transfusion in the perioperative period has been reported to have a detrimental effect on survival in many types of cancer. Other studies have failed to confirm this. We have examined retrospectively the records of 246 patients with prostatic carcinoma who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary between 1977 and 1982. Bilateral orchiectomy (BLO) was performed in 193 patients. Of these patients, 71 of 246 (29 per cent) received perioperative blood transfusion. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is the potential down-regulation of host cellular immune function with transfusion (Blumberg and Heal, 1990). A number of retrospective reviews have documented adverse outcomes (inferior overall and disease-free survival) in patients receiving blood transfusions for a variety of malignancies including colon/rectum, lung, prostate, uterine cervix, breast and soft tissues (Rosenberg et al, 1985;Tartter et al, 1985;Arnoux et al, 1988;Blumberg et al, 1988;Corman et al, 1988;Heal et al, 1988;Moores et al, 1989;Wobbes et al, 1989;Little et al, 1990;McClinton et al, 1990;Casper et al, 1991). Thus, although transfusion can improve tissue oxygenation and potentially enhance the effectiveness of RT, any radiobiological gain might be mitigated by the adverse effects of transfusion on tumour immunosurveillance (Levine and Vijayakumar, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is the potential down-regulation of host cellular immune function with transfusion (Blumberg and Heal, 1990). A number of retrospective reviews have documented adverse outcomes (inferior overall and disease-free survival) in patients receiving blood transfusions for a variety of malignancies including colon/rectum, lung, prostate, uterine cervix, breast and soft tissues (Rosenberg et al, 1985;Tartter et al, 1985;Arnoux et al, 1988;Blumberg et al, 1988;Corman et al, 1988;Heal et al, 1988;Moores et al, 1989;Wobbes et al, 1989;Little et al, 1990;McClinton et al, 1990;Casper et al, 1991). Thus, although transfusion can improve tissue oxygenation and potentially enhance the effectiveness of RT, any radiobiological gain might be mitigated by the adverse effects of transfusion on tumour immunosurveillance (Levine and Vijayakumar, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 This, in turn, may be attributable to the reduction in surgical stress response that regional anesthesia provides by blocking nociceptive afferent inputs. 3 Allogeneic blood transfusion is known to decrease cancer survival, 4,5 and regional anesthesia reduces the risk of such transfusions. Our group previously demonstrated that the use of a combined general/epidural hypotensive anesthesia technique during radical prostate surgery resulted in less need for allogeneic blood.…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large bleed seemed to be associated with a doubled risk of general progression and death from prostatic cancer as compared to those with a small bleed, but this risk estimate was only close to reaching statistical significance. This finding offers an alternative explanation of why blood transfusions seem to promote death in prostatic cancer [17]. In the present study, a large blood loss was associated with an increased risk of death although only one of the patients received erythrocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%