1963
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-196303000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Volume in Experimental Endotoxic and Hemorrhagic Shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peripheral resistance units (PRU) = mean arterial BP (mm Hg) cardiac output (ml/s) Plasma volume and red cell mass were determined simultaneously and independently by a double-labeling radioisotope dilution technique [2]. Plasma volume was determined by injecting 1 ml of human serum albumin labeled with 2.0 microcuries of I 125 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Peripheral resistance units (PRU) = mean arterial BP (mm Hg) cardiac output (ml/s) Plasma volume and red cell mass were determined simultaneously and independently by a double-labeling radioisotope dilution technique [2]. Plasma volume was determined by injecting 1 ml of human serum albumin labeled with 2.0 microcuries of I 125 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only published data on changes of blood volume were obtained during the course of three nonlethal poisonings [7], Several investigators have indicated that blood volume studies in dogs are reliable only when red cell mass and plasma volume are measured simultaneously and independently [1,2,4]. GRABLE et al [2] utilized this type of monitoring in a study of hemorrhagic and endotoxic shock and did not find a significant preterminal deficit in total blood volume (mean 7 %). Through the use of this technique, the preterminal deficit in total blood volume in our 10 dogs with acute iron poisoning averaged 30 %.…”
Section: Hoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Plasma volume measured with dilution techniques fails to decrease in splenectomized dogs and primates (monkeys) subjected to circulatory shock, and hematocrit fails to increase relative to control (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). Other investigators (16,19,(22)(23)(24) employing these same techniques have failed to find evidence for significant transvascular fluid efflux in dogs (intact spleens) subjected to shock, i.e., the magnitude of the measured decrease in plasma volume was small. In man, the available data, although sparse and fragmentary, fail to provide evidence for fluid filtration in circulatory shock (15,25,26).…”
Section: Grega Schwinghamer Haddymentioning
confidence: 99%