2021
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BloodGen3Module: blood transcriptional module repertoire analysis and visualization using R

Abstract: Motivation We previously described the construction and characterization of generic and reusable blood transcriptional module repertoires. More recently we released a third iteration (“BloodGen3” module repertoire) that comprises 382 functionally annotated gene sets (modules) and encompasses 14,168 transcripts. Custom bioinformatic tools are needed to support downstream analysis, visualization and interpretation relying on such fixed module repertoires. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To further characterize patient cluster variability at a molecular level, we then used the blood transcriptome modular repertoire recently established on an expended range of disease and pathological states. The latter includes 382 transcriptome modules based on genes co-expression patterns across 16 diseases and 985 unique transcriptome profiles 9 . Again, no aggregate was found differentially expressed in C2 confirming the healthy-like profile of these patients, whereas an up-regulated IFN signature dominated in C1, C3, and C4 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To further characterize patient cluster variability at a molecular level, we then used the blood transcriptome modular repertoire recently established on an expended range of disease and pathological states. The latter includes 382 transcriptome modules based on genes co-expression patterns across 16 diseases and 985 unique transcriptome profiles 9 . Again, no aggregate was found differentially expressed in C2 confirming the healthy-like profile of these patients, whereas an up-regulated IFN signature dominated in C1, C3, and C4 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Each heatmap, achieved with BloodGen3Module R package 9 , represents one of the most significant patterns differentiating the four clusters of 304 pSS patients (C1: 101, C2: 77, C3: 88, and C4: 38) compared to 330 healthy volunteers (HV). These patterns correspond to modules associated with IFN, neutrophils, inflammation, cytokines/chemokines, protein synthesis, erythrocytes, monocytes, B cells and T cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other groups proposed a modular approach to group DEGs into groups according to their pathway or function [ 3 ]. There are 382 modules while each has a dozen of genes, and software was used to interpret change of TA inside modules [ 25 ]. Nonetheless, interpretation of fingerprint profile output from these 382 modules is not easy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) (Subramanian et al, 2005) was performed with fast GSEA (Korotkevich et al, 2021) using the fgseaMultilevel function on genes ranked bylog 10 (p value)*sign(log 2 fold-change), with significance and fold-change values obtained from the DGE analyses. Minimum gene set size was set to 20 and gene sets used were low-annotation blood transcription modules (BTMs) (Li et al, 2014), high-annotation BTMs (Kazmin et al, 2017), BloodGen3 modules (Rinchai et al, 2021), or modules derived from the Monaco et al RNA-seq dataset (Monaco et al, 2019). For the Monaco modules, a gene was included within a cell type-specific module if its expression z-score (scaled across all cell types) was greater than 1.75 for that cell type.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%