2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2017.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-up for semilinear damped wave equations with subcritical exponent in the scattering case

Abstract: It is well-known that the critical exponent for semilinear damped wave equations is Fujita exponent when the damping is effective. Lai, Takamura and Wakasa in 2017 have obtained a blow-up result not only for super-Fujita exponent but also for the one closely related to Strauss exponent when the damping is scaling invariant and its constant is relatively small, which has been recently extended by Ikeda and Sobajima.Introducing a multiplier for the time-derivative of the spatial integral of unknown functions, we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us recall the definition of some multipliers related to our model, which have been introduced in [25], and some properties of them, that we will employ throughout the remaining sections.…”
Section: Iteration Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us recall the definition of some multipliers related to our model, which have been introduced in [25], and some properties of them, that we will employ throughout the remaining sections.…”
Section: Iteration Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also refer the reader to D'Abbicco [2] and D'Abbicco-Lucente-Reissig [5] for global existence results and determination of the critical exponent for the special case µ = 2, respectively. In the scattering case b(t) = (1 + t) −β with β > 1, Lai-Takamura [15] proved the blowup result for 1 < p < p S (N), and therefore, in this case the damping term can be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Remark 2.3. As we have already mentioned the proof of Lemma 2.2 follows the approach from Section 3 in [18]. However, the same estimates can be proved by following the proof of Lemma 5.1 in [35], by working with a different functional in place of U 1 .…”
Section: Lemma 22mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Now we can proceed with the second part of the proof, where we use a standard iteration argument (see for example [18,34] in the cae of a single equation or [1,25] in the case of a weakly coupled system). We will apply an iteration method based on lower bound estimates (19), (20), (29), (31) and the iteration frame (30), (32).…”
Section: Iteration Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation