2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-up of solutions to critical semilinear wave equations with variable coefficients

Abstract: We verify the critical case p = p 0 (n) of Strauss' conjecture [31] concerning the blow-up of solutions to semilinear wave equations with variable coefficients in R n , where n ≥ 2. The perturbations of Laplace operator are assumed to be smooth and decay exponentially fast at infinity. We also obtain a sharp lifespan upper bound for solutions with compactly supported data when p = p 0 (n). The unified approach to blow-up problems in all dimensions combines several classical ideas in order to generalize and sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for any test functions φ, ψ ∈ C ∞ 0 ([0, T ) × R n ) and any t ∈ [0, T ). The remaining part of this section is organized as follows: first, in Section 6.1 we recall some auxiliary functions from [47] and we use them to introduce the functionals for the critical case; in Section 6.2 we derive the iteration frame for these functionals, that is, a coupled system of nonlinear ordinary integral inequalities; in Section 6.3 lower bound estimates for the functionals, that allow to start with the iteration procedure, are derived; then, in Section 6.4 we combine the iteration frame from Section 6.2 and the lower bounds from Section 6.3 with a slicing method; hence, in Section 6.5 we use the sequences of lower bounds for the functionals from Section 6.4 to prove the blow-up result and to establish the upper bound for the lifespan; finally, in Section 6.6 we compare our results with those proved in Section 9 of [16] and we provide the analytic expression of the coordinates of the cusp point for the critical curve in the pq plane.…”
Section: Critical Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for any test functions φ, ψ ∈ C ∞ 0 ([0, T ) × R n ) and any t ∈ [0, T ). The remaining part of this section is organized as follows: first, in Section 6.1 we recall some auxiliary functions from [47] and we use them to introduce the functionals for the critical case; in Section 6.2 we derive the iteration frame for these functionals, that is, a coupled system of nonlinear ordinary integral inequalities; in Section 6.3 lower bound estimates for the functionals, that allow to start with the iteration procedure, are derived; then, in Section 6.4 we combine the iteration frame from Section 6.2 and the lower bounds from Section 6.3 with a slicing method; hence, in Section 6.5 we use the sequences of lower bounds for the functionals from Section 6.4 to prove the blow-up result and to establish the upper bound for the lifespan; finally, in Section 6.6 we compare our results with those proved in Section 9 of [16] and we provide the analytic expression of the coordinates of the cusp point for the critical curve in the pq plane.…”
Section: Critical Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 6.4. Let us stress that differently from [47,Lemma 3.1] we require in the statement of (i) and (ii) the condition of r > −1 instead of r > 0. Nonetheless, the proofs from [47] of (i) and of the lower bound for η r (t, s, x) in (ii) are still valid even for r > −1.…”
Section: Introduction Of the Functionals For The Critical Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining part of this paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we recall a multiplier, that has been introduced in [18] in order to study the corresponding single semilinear equation, and its properties and we derive some lower bounds for certain functionals related to a local solution; then, in Section 3 we prove Theorem 1.2 by using the preparatory results from Section 2 and an iterative method. Finally, in Section 4 we prove the result in the critical case adapting the approach from [35,36] for a weakly coupled system. In particular, the slicing method is employed in order to deal with logarithmic factors in the iteration argument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This argument requires the special solutions of corresponding linear wave equation having slowly decaying property. To construct this kind of solution, we used the construction by Wakasa-Yordanov [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%