2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-up of solutions to semilinear parabolic equations on Riemannian manifolds with negative sectional curvature

Abstract: On Riemannian manifolds with negative sectional curvature, we study finite time blow-up and global existence of solutions to semilinear parabolic equations, where the power nonlinearity is multiplied by a time-dependent positive function h(t). We show that depending on the behavior at infinity of h, either every solution blows up in finite time, or a global solution exists, if the initial datum is small enough. In particular, if h≡1 we have global existence for small initial data, whereas for h(t)=eαt a Fujita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
33
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtain global existence also for h(t) = e σt (σ > 0) and p > 1 + σ λ1(M) . On the other hand, for p < 1 + σ λ1(M) , there is finite time blow-up, by results in [19]. Observe that, in order to deal with special functions h, we prove that there exist λ ∈ (0, λ 1 ] and a weak bounded supersolution of (1.3) for such λ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We obtain global existence also for h(t) = e σt (σ > 0) and p > 1 + σ λ1(M) . On the other hand, for p < 1 + σ λ1(M) , there is finite time blow-up, by results in [19]. Observe that, in order to deal with special functions h, we prove that there exist λ ∈ (0, λ 1 ] and a weak bounded supersolution of (1.3) for such λ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…• Assume (A 0 ) and (A 1 ). For h ≡ 1, from the results in [20] we get global existence, if u 0 L n 2 (p−1) (M) or u 0 L p (M) is small enough. This assumption is clearly different in character form those made in Theorems 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations