2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-up phenomena of semilinear wave equations and their weakly coupled systems

Abstract: In this paper we consider the wave equations with power type nonlinearities including timederivatives of unknown functions and their weakly coupled systems. We propose a framework of test function method and give a simple proof of the derivation of sharp upper bound of lifespan of solutions to nonlinear wave equations and their systems. We point out that for respective critical case, we use a family of self-similar solution to the standard wave equation including Gauss's hypergeometric functions which are orig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(102 reference statements)
5
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the kernel functions E, K 0 , K 1 are defined by (14), (15) and (16), respectively. Due to the sign assumption for u 0 it follows that U 0 is a nonnegative function.…”
Section: Comparison Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where the kernel functions E, K 0 , K 1 are defined by (14), (15) and (16), respectively. Due to the sign assumption for u 0 it follows that U 0 is a nonnegative function.…”
Section: Comparison Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us point out that we assumed throughout the paper that the parameters µ, ν 2 satisfy δ ≥ 0 for the single semilinear equation (respectively, µ 1 , µ 2 , ν 2 1 , ν 2 2 satisfy δ 1 , δ 2 ≥ 0 for the weakly coupled system). This assumptions are made in order to guarantee that the kernel functions defined by (14), (15) and (16) are nonnegative functions. Moreover, in the blow-up argument we estimate from below the hypergeometric functions by positive constants.…”
Section: Final Remarks and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the cases G 1 (v, ∂ t v) = |v| p , G 2 (u, ∂ t u) = |u| q and G 1 (v, ∂ t v) = |∂ t v| p , G 2 (u, ∂ t u) = |∂ t u| q have been studied in [5,3,4,2,23,22,8,24] and in [6,52,21,16], respectively. While in the case of power nonlinearities (that is, for G 1 (v, ∂ t v) = |v| p , G 2 (u, ∂ t u) = |u| q ) the critical curve is given by…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…even though the global existence part has been studied so far only in the three dimensional and radial symmetric case. Recently, the case with mixed nonlinear terms G 1 (v, ∂ t v) = |v| q , G 2 (u, ∂ t u) = |∂ t u| p has been investigated for (4) in [13,16]. In this paper we shall prove that the for same range of exponents p, q > 1 as in [16] a blow-up result can be proved in the subcritiacal case even when we add as lower order terms in the linear part damping terms with time-dependent and scattering producing coefficients (see [49,50,51] for this classification of a damping term with time-dependent coefficient for wave models).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%