Blue Eyes Help Men Reduce the Cost of Cuckoldry

Abstract

Men with light eyes lack the dominant gene allele that codes for dark-brown eyes. Pairing with a woman who lacks the same allele must increase paternity confidence in these men, because any children with dark eyes would be extremely unlikely to have been fathered by them. This notion implies that men with light (blue or green) eyes should (1) prefer light-eyed women, especially in a long-term context, and (2) feel more threatened by light-eyed than by dark-eyed rivals. Yet because choosiness is costly and paternity concerns are entirely driven by the prospect of paternal investment, any such inclinations would be adaptive only in men who expect to invest in their children. Here I test these ideas using the data of over 1000 men who rated the facial attractiveness of potential partners, and the threat of potential rivals, whose eye color had been manipulated. Light-eyed men liked light-eyed women better (particularly as long-term companions), and feared light-eyed rivals more, than did dark-eyed men. An exploratory analysis showed that these large, robust effects disappeared in men who had felt rejected by their fathers while growing up—suggesting that such men are not expecting to invest in their own children either.

Using mathematical modeling, identify the repetition and progression of the human eye's colour pattern

“…Overall, blue eyes have been caused by a single recessive gene, and a blue-eyed parent could never produce a brown-eyed child. Even though dominant and recessive genes refer to inheritance patterns, Moreover, they describe how likely it is for a certain trait to pass from parent to offspring [35][36][37]. Therefore, eye iris colour is found by variations in a person's genes.…”