“…However, these two domains fundamentally differs from each other on the following aspects: (a) The Tavşanlı Zone was buried into a very cold subduction zone (Okay, 2002;Whitney & Davis, 2006), whereas peak metamorphic conditions were relatively "warmer" for the Bitlis complex; (b) the HP metamorphic rocks of the Bitlis complex were strongly overprinted by collision-type metamorphism, whereas the Tavşanlı Zone HP rocks were cooled down during their exhumation, as indicated by widespread pristine lawsonite; (c) the Bitlis complex represents a continental passive margin fragment, including neritic sedimentary cover and substratum, whereas the Tavşanlı Zone consists mainly of metamorphosed mafic and pelagic sedimentary rocks (Okay, 1984) and (d) the evolution of the Bitlis complex is related to the closure of a oceanic domain once located between the Arabian continental to the south, and the Anatolide-Tauride block to the north, whereas the Tavşanlı Zone stems from the northern edge of the later related then to the closure of another oceanic realm further north (Barrier & Vrielynck, 2008;Okay & Tüysüz, 1999;Şengör & Yılmaz, 1981), and likely are connected eastwards to the Amassia-Stepanevan blueschists (Rolland, Billo, Corsini, Sosson, & Galoyan, 2008).…”