2003
DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2003.1265849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence: challenges and solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Coexistence in unlicensed bands has previously received significant attention outside the cognitive radio community [11] with Bluetooth/WLAN coexistence being a prominent example of practical concern. A possible approach to interference mitigation in this context is adaptive frequency hopping [12].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Coexistence in unlicensed bands has previously received significant attention outside the cognitive radio community [11] with Bluetooth/WLAN coexistence being a prominent example of practical concern. A possible approach to interference mitigation in this context is adaptive frequency hopping [12].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, we have seen that while the WLAN's carrier sensing remains unaltered, a packet collision is likely to cause a packet error. For ease of analysis, and because such an assumption has frequently been made in other papers [11], we assume that every collision inevitably results in a packet error. This is a worst case assumption given our measurement results.…”
Section: Cognitive Medium Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By adopting this model it was possible to simulate nonindependent burst errors of the kind that cause problems to an ARQ mechanism. Though B/T v.1.2 adopted an Adaptive Frequency Hopping scheme (AFH), G.-E. is still used herein to model the channel, because AFH is of limited benefit to audio/video applications [5], especially when interference occurs across the unlicensed 2.4 GHz ISM band. The mean duration of a good state, T g , was set at 2 s and in a bad state, T b , was set to 0.5 s. In units of the B/T time slot duration, T g = 3200 and T b = 800, which implies from:…”
Section: Adaptive-retrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently the coexistence issue has gained increasing attention [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, to date most coexistence schemes are designed for simultaneous functionality of a Bluetooth piconet and an 802.11b WLAN.…”
Section: B1 Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%