2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01721-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bluetooth Tracking without Discoverability

Abstract: Abstract. Outdoor location-based services are now prevalent due to advances in mobile technology and GPS. Indoors, however, even coarse location remains unavailable. Bluetooth has been identified as a potential location technology that mobile consumer devices already support, easing deployment and maintenance. However, Bluetooth tracking systems to date have relied on the Bluetooth inquiry mode to constantly scan for devices. This process is very slow and can be a security and privacy risk. In this paper we in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All further processing was done in the scanner. In comparison with other studies that did need a connection (Hay & Harle, 2009), the methodology used in this experiment is better suited for mass events where the participation of the tracked individuals should be minimal. Every time a device was detected, its MAC address, COD code, and the timestamp of the detection were registered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All further processing was done in the scanner. In comparison with other studies that did need a connection (Hay & Harle, 2009), the methodology used in this experiment is better suited for mass events where the participation of the tracked individuals should be minimal. Every time a device was detected, its MAC address, COD code, and the timestamp of the detection were registered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This essentially allows us to have a very low response time without creating a large overhead on the wireless channel. In fact, the response time achieved is much lower than other RF technologies, like Bluetooth devices that have an interval period of about 12 s (Hay and Harle 2009).…”
Section: Journal Of Location Based Services 101mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is a widely used concept in navigation software (Chen et al, 2014). The search for more than room-level accuracy might however be irrelevant in many applications (Cheung et al, 2006;Hay and Harle, 2009;Fernandes, 2011). In this research for example, room-level accuracy was sufficient and therefore the proximity principle could be used.…”
Section: Indoor Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%