2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BMI-based obesity cutoffs and excess adiposity in a Caribbean adolescent population of African origin

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of recommended body mass index (BMI)-based classification systems in detecting excess body fat (BF) in an Afro-Caribbean adolescent population. Subjects: All adolescents aged 12-18 years were invited to participate in the study. A total of 3749 persons participated fully in the study. Result: Males (12.2%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7, 13.9) and females (43.6%) (95% CI: 41.5, 45.7) had excess adiposity. Specificities were high for all cutoff values (range 90… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
13
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 6991 Singaporean adolescents aged 12 to 18 years, the sensitivities and specificities of WHO-2007 criteria using the top 5% of body fatness (estimated by four skinfolds measurements) as the reference standard were 69.4 and 95.0% for boys; 53.0 and 98.1% for girls, respectively 10 . The present study found small differences in values of specificities between boys and girls (but only for WHO-2007 reference), whereas the BMI classification systems analyzed by other studies showed, in general, better sensitivity for boys and better specificity for girls [4][5][6]10,13 . A systematic review study1 showed higher values of sensitivity and similar values of specificity for obesity definition when a national reference data was compared to the IOTF approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 6991 Singaporean adolescents aged 12 to 18 years, the sensitivities and specificities of WHO-2007 criteria using the top 5% of body fatness (estimated by four skinfolds measurements) as the reference standard were 69.4 and 95.0% for boys; 53.0 and 98.1% for girls, respectively 10 . The present study found small differences in values of specificities between boys and girls (but only for WHO-2007 reference), whereas the BMI classification systems analyzed by other studies showed, in general, better sensitivity for boys and better specificity for girls [4][5][6]10,13 . A systematic review study1 showed higher values of sensitivity and similar values of specificity for obesity definition when a national reference data was compared to the IOTF approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Most studies that evaluated the performance of recommended BMI cut-off values of the reference system based their comparisons on estimates of sensitivity and specificity [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . In this study the above-mentioned measures were used to compare the two classification systems, whereas the LR estimation was used to select the optimal cut-offs in each curve, allowing the calculation of the post-test probabilities for each BMI reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, better sensitivity was found for boys and better specificity for girls 5,8,11,18,21 . Several studies compared the diagnostic accuracy between national and international BMI references, and found better sensitivity using the national references 5,7,8,21,24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies on the diagnostic accuracy of BMI-based classification systems when screening individuals with excess body fat have used statistical analyses such as sensitivity and specificity [3][4][5][6] , area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve [7][8][9][10] , and likelihood ratio 7,10,11 . In most studies, a significantly higher sensitivity was reported for national references when compared with the references of the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) [3][4][5]7,8 or of the World Health Organization (WHO-2007) 5 , and the opposite for specificity 3,5,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%