2013
DOI: 10.1097/01.sih.0000441600.79662.c7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board 348 - Research Abstract Validation of the Mayo High Performance Team Work Scale and Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale for Evaluation of Crisis Team Training (Submission #472)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Still, this ICC remains well above the ICC observed by Iwashita et al when determining the reliability and validity of the MHPTS compared to the Ottawa GRS in a simulated crisis teamwork course. 10 Some participants may have a better capacity to partake in MP than others, and we did not control for MP capacity (as assessed by the mMIQ) during the randomization process. Future research on MP could stratify group allocation based on the capacity to engage in MP or recruit a sufficient number of participants to perform subgroup analyses based on mMIQ scores.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 Still, this ICC remains well above the ICC observed by Iwashita et al when determining the reliability and validity of the MHPTS compared to the Ottawa GRS in a simulated crisis teamwork course. 10 Some participants may have a better capacity to partake in MP than others, and we did not control for MP capacity (as assessed by the mMIQ) during the randomization process. Future research on MP could stratify group allocation based on the capacity to engage in MP or recruit a sufficient number of participants to perform subgroup analyses based on mMIQ scores.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The inter-rater reliability for the MHPTS has been found to be moderate, and the MHPTS performs similarly to the Ottawa Global Rating Scale (GRS) when novice-novice raters, expertexpert raters, and novice-expert raters are compared. 10 Our secondary end point was the participant's score on the mMIQ. The mMIQ was applied to control for individual variation in mental imagery aptitude.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%