2017
DOI: 10.22547/ber/9.1.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board Characteristics, Political Connections, and Corporate Cash Holdings: The Role of Firm Size and Political Regime

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(147 reference statements)
9
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inconsistent results can be explained because of dissimilar sample size and time horizon. Consistent with Ullah and Kamal (2017), the board meeting has a mean value of 5.2. As for the frequency of meetings, the mean value for our sample is higher than SECP required criteria of minimum four meetings in a year.…”
Section: The Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrixmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inconsistent results can be explained because of dissimilar sample size and time horizon. Consistent with Ullah and Kamal (2017), the board meeting has a mean value of 5.2. As for the frequency of meetings, the mean value for our sample is higher than SECP required criteria of minimum four meetings in a year.…”
Section: The Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrixmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Further, Detthamrong et al (2017) argued in their study that behavior of corporate governance varies across firm's characteristics. Among others, Ullah and Kamal (2017) also argued that the size of the firm should be considered by policy makers while formulating framework for corporate governance. Thus, in current study, we explored the corporate governance mechanism and firm performance in a dynamic penal setting for sub samples (Small firms & Large firms).…”
Section: Regression Analysis For Sub Samples (Small Firms and Large Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The index has seen several episodes of booms and busts (Mallik & Chowdhury, 2001). Further, many firms are owned by families (W. Ullah, Ali, & Mehmood, 2017;S. Ullah & Kamal, 2017) that engenders the problem of information asymmetry.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‫بعض‬ (Ullah andkamal, 2017, Hill et al, 2014 ( Faccio, 2006, Fisman, 2001 (Johnson and Mitton, 2003, Cull and Xu, 2005, Dinc, 2005, Bai et al, 2006, Charumilind et al, 2006, Leuz and Oberholzer, 2006, Li et al, 2008, Claessens et al, 2008, Wu et al, 2012, Xu et al, 2013, Yeu et al, 2013…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%