Board directors' home regions and CSR disclosure: evidence from France

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of directors' home regions on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. Specifically, the authors aim to determine whether Anglo-American, European, French, other European and other regional directors' presence affects CSR disclosure differently. Design/methodology/approach This empirical study uses panel data analysis of all listed firms on the SBF 120 from 2008 to 2019. The environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores are collected from the Bloomberg database and indicate the extent of CSR information disclosure by French companies. The paper is based on a dynamic generalized method of moments panel estimator that makes it possible to control for unobservable heterogeneity and endogeneity and reduces estimation bias. Findings The findings of this study provide evidence that home region diversity and the presence of Anglo-Americans on a board are positively and significantly associated with ESG disclosure and environmental disclosure, whereas they are negatively associated with social and governance disclosure. Surprisingly, when directors come from European countries, they disclose less ESG and environmental information. Nevertheless, when only French directors are present, the company tends to divulge all dimensions of CSR. Indeed, while there is a significant positive influence of French directors on ESG disclosure, the presence of other European directors displays negative and statistically significant regression coefficients. Research limitations/implications This study may be interesting the French policy makers who can now pay more appropriate attention to directors' nationality or region. Thus, firms should identify the foreign directors who can support their strategy with relevant experience in terms of CSR. This could help to change the opinion of some companies that consider the internalization of the board as a constraint rather than an opportunity. These results will be useful for French-listed companies in setting the criteria for the appointment of foreign directors. It may be interesting to recruit directors across European boundaries. Practical implications This paper attempts to provide a better understanding of the effects of the home regions of directors on CSR disclosure in order to enlighten corporate managers whose companies operate in different cultures given that they have to deal with this aspect. In this international business environment, CEOs should increasingly consider the international CSR experience of directors to be a resource. In addition, this study may be of relevance to French market authorities, which constantly encourage firms to diversify the profiles of directors on their boards and recruit more international members. Originality/value This study is the first to evince that the disclosure of each CSR disclosure score differs depending on the directors' home regions. Unlike previous studies, the authors focused simultaneously on the resource-based view (RBV) and institutional theory.

Does board capital enhance corporate social responsibility disclosure quality? The role of CEO power

“…Thus, H4 is not supported. The finding reflects the context of Saudi Arabia where most firms are family‐owned and most of the board directors are family or royal family members with very less foreign members constituting the board (Nasser, 2020) when compared to firms in advanced countries where there is high diversity in board nationality (Toumi et al, 2022).…”

Digitalization, Spillover and Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: Evidence From China

“…Different institutions use different indices for measuring ESG performance, which may have impacted the results of the study. Referring to previous studies (Chen et al, 2023a;Toumi et al, 2022), Bloomberg's ESG disclosure score is used to measure ESG performance, and the results of the GS3SLS estimation in 2020 are summarized in columns ( 5) and ( 6) of Table 4. A comparison of the results with columns (1) and (2) in Table 3 shows that both are consistent in terms of the regression coefficients of ESG, DIG, and intra-industry spillover effects.…”

The role of foreign board and ownership on the quality of sustainability disclosure: the moderating effect of social reputation

“…In addition, some researchers suggest that most foreign directors are foreigners and more independent. Therefore, high levels of disclosure and transparency are expected to be done, as they have extensive international network connections with the stakeholders (Ibrahim and Hanefah, 2016;Beji et al, 2021;Toumi et al, 2022). Meanwhile, companies with good social reputations will tend to maintain it as it positively impacts the companies.…”

“…Based on agency theory, this will improve the quality of monitoring and reduce agency costs so that the company can implement the recommended practices, including improving the quality of its sustainability reports. Research on the effect of foreign board members presence on sustainability disclosure has been carried out by Muttakin and Subramaniam (2015), Ibrahim and Hanefah (2016), Lau et al (2016), Liao et al (2018), Beji et al (2021), Colakoglu et al (2021) and Toumi et al (2022) and resulted in different findings.…”