2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.965991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board Interlocking Network and the Design of Executive Compensation Packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings pertaining to the equity‐based portion of CEO pay are consistent with the findings presented in Wong, Gygax and Wang () and Gallani (). However, neither of these studies examines the effect of director networks on a CEO's delta or vega.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings pertaining to the equity‐based portion of CEO pay are consistent with the findings presented in Wong, Gygax and Wang () and Gallani (). However, neither of these studies examines the effect of director networks on a CEO's delta or vega.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our study relates to Bouwman (), who examines how governance practices propagate across firms and finds that observed practices are partly the outcome of network effects among firms sharing directors. Our study also relates to Wong, Gygax and Wang () and Gallani (), who find that board interlocks lead to similarities in the composition of executive pay . In pursuit of a better understanding of the economic forces behind such influences, we extend these studies and examine in more detail how director networks are used to set CEO pay.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The more restrictive definition of board interlocks proposed by Knowles (1973) is, therefore, more appropriate for a study of compensation design. and the relative weight assigned to cash and equity-based components of CEO pay (Wong and Gygax 2009;Conyon et al 2011) Whereas effective compensation design should drive boards to internalize compensation practices adopted by others only to the extent that they correspond to structural, strategic, and organizational similarities, two main factors interfere with the pursuit of this goal. First, board members often lack formal training in compensation design, which is a complex task involving significant uncertainty.…”
Section: Board Interlocksmentioning
confidence: 99%