Board of directors characteristics and disclosure practices of corporate social responsibility: a comparative study between Brazilian and Spanish companies

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to verify if the characteristics of the board of directors (BD) affects the disclosure practices of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Two different population samples were used from the period 2008-2011: Brazilian listed companies and Spanish companies. It is observed that the size of the board positively affects CSR disclosure practices of the two groups of companies. The percentage of independent directors of the board members positively affects the disclosure practices of CSR in Spanish companies. The percentage of participants of the board women positively impacts the disclosure practices of CSR in Brazilian companies. Design/methodology/approach The authors worked with two different population samples: one, composed by the Brazilian listed companies in BM&FBOVESPA and other by Spanish companies listed on Madrid Stock Exchange. The selection of this period was due to the increase in the adoption of GRI guidelines from 2008 (Prado-Lorenzo et al., 2012). In addition, as Spanish companies disclose more CSR reports according to the GRI guidelines (Global Reporting Initiative, 2012), this is a suitable environment for the analysis. Findings Regarding the research question of this study, it was found that the profile of the board affects the disclosure practices of CSR of Brazilian and Spanish companies. The size of the board positively affects CSR disclosure practices of the two groups of companies. The percentage of independent directors of the board members positively affects the disclosure practices of CSR in Spanish companies. The percentage of participants of the board women positively impacts the disclosure practices of CSR in Brazilian companies. Research limitations/implications Both the BD of Spanish companies as the Brazilian still requires the participation of a greater number of women. It is important to remember that the variable that represents women in the board presented a positive impact on the dependent variables, and it is statistically significant, so it is possible to affirm that when a large number of women are on the Board, the company tends to disclose more standardized information about CSR practices. These results are in line to other empirical analysis that defend that women usually introduce more philanthropic worries (Ibrahim and Angelidis, 1991) and tend to provide higher information transparency, especially about sustainability issues (Barako and Brown, 2008; Prado-Lorenzo and García-Sánchez, 2010; Frías-Aceituno et al., 2012). Practical implications This research should benefit, in this sense, investors, managers and policymakers, civil society representatives and corporate managers themselves active in the two economies investigated. Social implications It should be noticed that both Brazil and Spain use to encourage joint research between researchers of Brazilian and Spanish universities, funding projects developed in partnership as Cooperation Programme signed in 2001 by the Ministries of Education in both countries. Thus, it is justified the choice of Spain for its comparative analysis due to the need for more field studies on this topic in both countries, and also that it has been promoted by their governments. Originality/value It is expected that the results of this research contribute to the identification of relevant factors in disclosure of corporate environmental policies and actions that may be useful in the decision-making process of various stakeholders. Such identification will also allow us to identify possible relationships between environmental initiatives, the profile of BD.

Ownership Structure and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure in Kenya: Interaction Effect of Board Gender Diversity

“…In Table 7 under model 2 and 3, there was a statistically significant effect of board gender diversity and corporate sustainability disclosure as shown by (β = .305, p-value = .008<.05) and (β = .135, p-value = .013<.05). This therefore supports the findings by (Disli et al, 2022;Formigoni et al, 2020;Guerrero-Villegas et al, 2018). Given characteristics, women working as corporate executives perform better than their male counterparts (Van Staveren, 2014), actively chip in strategic concerns affecting stakeholders more than shareholders (Huse, Nielsen, & Hagen, 2009) on top of giving more contributions toward decisions touching on corporate social responsibility (Burgess & Tharenou, 2002).…”

“…As a result, the study controlled firm size and leverage. Percentage of female in the board of directors (Al Amosh, 2022;Ananzeh et al, 2022;Disli et al, 2022;Formigoni et al, 2020) Corporate Sustainability Disclosure (CSD) (Dependent Variable) Corporate sustainability reporting disclosure items whereby dummy value '1' is given if disclosed and '0' if otherwise. Percentage score is computed given the total number disclosure items (Gurvitsh & Sidorova, 2012;Kinyua, 2020)…”

Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda

“…Dyduch & Krasodomska, 2017;Khan, 2010;Mousa et al, 2018), other studies find positive effects on disclosure (e.g. Anazonwu et al, 2018;Formigoni et al, 2020) and specifically on its level (e.g. Al Fadli et al, 2019;Campanella et al, 2021;Dienes & Velte, 2016;Ullah et al, 2019), quality (e.g.…”

Corporate social responsibility and competitiveness: a study of Brazilian multinationals

“…The benefits arising from each form of governance, with different resource configurations, can create the potential to improve the company's environmental, social and governance performance (Antonietti et al, 2016;Husted & Sousa-Filho, 2016). The activities developed internally have a strong connection with the main business of the company, and may improve, for example, the capacity for internal innovation, with effects on sustainable and financial performance (Formigoni et al, 2020;Lee & Min, 2015).…”