2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijbge.2010.033344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board structure and firm value: a study on listed banking firms in the Asian emerging markets

Abstract: The banking sector in developing countries is regarded as an engine of economic growth (Arun, 2004). It is believed that corporate governance is necessary to ensure a sound financial system and, consequently, help develop the country's economy. Using a Pooled Generalised Least Squares (GLS) regression model, the relationship between board structure and bank's performance is analysed. A total of 107 listed banks in nine countries of the Asian emerging markets were included in the study. It is evidenced that onl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at the other two characteristics of the board (board size and CEOchairman duality) we find that board size has no impact on bank performance which is consistent with several empirical studies (Romano et al, 2012;Zulkafli et al, 2010;Belkhir, 2009). Our results do not provide evidence for the claim that large boards are likely to be inefficient due to the coordination, communication and free-rider problem.…”
Section: Fixed Effectssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Looking at the other two characteristics of the board (board size and CEOchairman duality) we find that board size has no impact on bank performance which is consistent with several empirical studies (Romano et al, 2012;Zulkafli et al, 2010;Belkhir, 2009). Our results do not provide evidence for the claim that large boards are likely to be inefficient due to the coordination, communication and free-rider problem.…”
Section: Fixed Effectssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Further, using the fixed effect estimator, the effect of independent directors is insignificant to the bank's financial stability indicators (measures). However, the effect of independent directors is positive on risk-taking when we use the GMM model supporting the view that an independent board Chairman constructively challenges the CEO and strengthens governance checks and balances (Zulkafli, Amran, and Abdul Samad, 2010). The effect of female directors is negative on banks' stability when we use the fixed effects estimators but positive in the GMM model for only credit risk measures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Caprio et al (2007) study the effects of governance (i.e., ownership structure, shareholder protection laws, cash flow rights, and empowering official supervisory and regulatory agencies) on the market valuations of banks. Similarly, Belkhir (2009) and Zulkafli et al (2010) provide evidence on the relationship between bank value and governance (i.e., board characteristics, board size and CEO duality).…”
Section: Background and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence on the market valuations of busy boards of directors is limited (e.g., Ferris et al 2003;Cashman et al 2012), focused on non-financial firms (i.e., the industrial sector) and provided mixed findings. Within the banking setting, examining stock market valuations (see Caprio et al 2007;Belkhir 2009;Zulkafli et al 2010) is restricted to focus only on other corporate governance mechanism and characteristics (e.g., ownership structure, shareholder protection laws, board size, and CEO duality). Therefore, relatively little is known about whether board busyness can either improve or detriment the bank market value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%