Boasting and aspiring, as status‐reinforcing mechanisms in status‐based loyalty programs

Abstract

In the retail industry, status‐based loyalty programs (SBLP) are commonly used as an important marketing tool to award elevated status to customers who exceed certain level of spending. In contrast to previous studies that have considered “target and bystander” and “member–non‐member” differentiation, this study responds to the need to account for the dynamics in across‐tier effects in loyalty programs (LPs). By undertaking a scenario‐based experiment that focuses on a “face‐to‐face” across‐tier social event, this study examines the joint effects of exclusivity, status visibility and social comparison on LP members’ status perception and willingness to spend. Contrary to prior beliefs that the beneficial effects for targets (e.g., VIP members) in status hierarchies are offset by the negative effects on bystanders (e.g., non‐VIP members), this study concludes that situations when social comparisons occur in SBLPs are not necessarily zero‐sum games. Ultimately, this study uncovered two distinct status‐reinforcing mechanisms–“aspiring” and “boasting”–which LP members may experience in SBLPs. The outcome of this study highlights important implications for companies to pursue different strategies aimed at enhancing members’ status perceptions.

Consumers' response to promotional gifts: The role of gender, transactional value, and reciprocity

“…A growing body of work suggests that the perceived intrinsic value of the good received as a gift—that is, its consumption value—may not tell the whole story. Rather, promotional gifts can also help build or strengthen the firm's relationship with its consumers (Lewis, 2004; Meyer‐Waarden, 2007; Palmatier et al, 2009; Sajtos & Chong, 2018). In general, gifts possess expressive value (Belk & Coon, 1993; Belk, 2010; Larsen & Watson, 2001; Sherry, 1983) and imbue feelings of connection, commitment, and shared meaning (Areni et al, 1998; De Wulf et al, 2001; Dunn et al, 2008; Ruth et al, 1999; Sherry, 1983; Wallendorf & Arnould, 1988).…”

Is travel bragging in the eye of the beholder? Bragger and audience perspectives

“…Travel experiences constitute one of many objects about which individuals brag about. Due to travel's intangibility, tourists seek to make tourism consumption more visible through experience sharing or bragging, which helps tourists enhance their social status among peers (Sajtos & Chong, 2018). Social media have greatly boosted the visibility of experiential consumption, with a growing trend of sharing experiences over material possessions (Bronner & deHoog, 2019).…”

The Impact of Brand Awareness, Brand Loyalty, and Brand Association on Consumer Decision Making in Palestine Olive Oil Industry

“…Regarding the focus on stores, Calvo-Porral, Martí nez, Juanatey, and Lé vy (2015), point out five components of brand value, which are store brand awareness, perceived store-brand quality, store brand loyalty, store brand price image, and store image. This is due to the combination of the Aaker model with store brand attributes such as knowledge, image, and price (Sajtos and Chong, 2018). These variables will be taken for the investigation on Aaker dimensions.…”