2007
DOI: 10.1080/1323238x.2007.11910824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boatloads of incongruity: the evolution of Australia's offshore processing regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…87 According to some scholars, IOM member states were concerned about potential 'mandate creep', towards a more protection-oriented agenda. 88 Such concerns may explain, at least in part, why the IOM Council insisted that in any new Agreement with the UN, the independence, mandate and efficiencies of IOM must be expressly retained.…”
Section: Obligationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…87 According to some scholars, IOM member states were concerned about potential 'mandate creep', towards a more protection-oriented agenda. 88 Such concerns may explain, at least in part, why the IOM Council insisted that in any new Agreement with the UN, the independence, mandate and efficiencies of IOM must be expressly retained.…”
Section: Obligationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1)'. 90 In considering the effects of Article 2 (5), it must be borne in mind that over the course of the past decade, IOM has advanced its human rights engagement through institutional policies such 86 IOM Council Resolution 1309 (n 40) para 2(a). 87 Other 'essential elements' include that IOM is 'an essential contributor in the field of migration and human mobility' and 'IOM must be in a position to continue to play this essential and experience-based role': IOM Council Resolution 1309 (n 40) para 2.…”
Section: Obligationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This policy has continued under successive conservative Liberal-National coalition governments since that time. Off-shore processing means that asylum seekers are forcibly transferred to Nauru or PNG and undergo a refugee status determination process in those countries (Penovic and Dastyari 2007). This policy has received considerable negative scrutiny both within Australia and internationally as breaching human rights standards and the spirit of the 1951 Refugee Convention (Archbold 2015;Henderson 2014;McAdam 2013).…”
Section: The Treatment Of Refugees-a Brief Overview Of the Australian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the geophysics of environmental events, these variations tend to be more rapid, more sudden and more total in their effects in smaller islanded economies. Nauru's function as an Australian offshore detention centre (a practice that seriously tests the notion of sovereignty) is one obvious and recent example (Penovic and Dastyari, 2007). Other suitable cases come to mind: whaling and Norfolk Island (Hoare, 1999: 85–87); pearl cultivation and nuclear testing in French Polynesia (Poirine, 2010; Haoatai and Monypenny, 2011); garment manufacturing in the Northern Marianas (McPhetres, 2011); bêche‐de‐mer in the Solomon Islands (Christensen, 2011); and kava and cut flowers from Fiji (Prasad and Raj, 2006; McGregor, 2007).…”
Section: Misplaced Hyperspecialisation?mentioning
confidence: 99%